Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@jeremy.mv.com: 165 ]

Total 165 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Shared Apex Loop Array (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:36:20 -0500
Is the SAL-30 available piecemeal? I have plenty of wire, coax, enclosures, support tubing, etc, and would just need the proprietary controller Since I already have 5 two wire 500-750' Beverages for
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00105.html (10,061 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: Low band noise (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:39:59 -0500
Utility company telemetry and control over the wires maybe? Carl KM1H I live in Waco Texas and there are no known windmils or inverters nearby that I know of. I have a lowband noise that is pretty br
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00145.html (9,989 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: circular polarization on 160m -BTW (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:43:16 -0500
I used it on 1296 a bit over 30 years ago, however both ends have to agree on which rotation they will use. I suspect it is more standardized now. And a lot easier to make power than a ring of 7289's
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00167.html (24,099 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: Yikes! Heavy snow, freezing fog and 23 degrees F in Raleigh, NC (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:50:59 -0500
Hey, you had plenty of advanced warning this one was going to be brutal! I hope you and anyone else in the path get thru it OK. The 2008 ice storm up here still shows plenty of scars and some of my V
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00170.html (10,898 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: Yikes! Heavy snow, freezing fog and 23 degrees F in Raleigh, NC (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:50:32 -0500
You can always prepare for your own safety Eddy; cut down trees that imperil buildings and vehicles, have a generator already pretested and in place, chain saw ready and tested in case you need to cu
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00175.html (11,928 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: Yikes! Heavy snow, freezing fog and 23 degrees F in Raleigh, NC (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:26:35 -0500
From what I see on the forcasts I'll also be needing luck. Once the snow hits about 5AM the winds will be slowly rising with the temperature and once it hits about 31 it will be in double digits reac
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00184.html (13,580 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: Power stayed on! (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:26:51 -0500
Thats good news Charlie. After about 4 hrs of fluff it started coming down pretty heavy maybe 20 minutes ago, no winds yet. This photo could be my road about half way down the hill, houses on the low
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00189.html (8,788 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: Question - optimum number of radials (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:45:58 -0500
While Tom touched on the subject yesterday the subject of an individuals ground conductivity has to be stressed, continuously it seems. The FCC maps arent perfect and hams usually dont have the optio
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00213.html (10,235 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:54:14 -0500
I used a noise bridge to cut all the RG-11 stacked yagi and phased verticals phasing lines as well as harmonic stubs here when running a 2 station single op contest, before SO2R. Using the station re
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00214.html (8,485 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:55:56 -0500
Null depth is a function of cable loss. ** Yup Heliax produces the deepest null, small diameter coax (RG-59, RG-58) is quite poor ** The highest VF and lowest loss produces the deepest null but also
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00224.html (10,612 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:17:40 -0500
Not always -- stubs made with higher Vf cables are longer, so in my experience they come out about the same for attenuation and bandwidth. The only way to get a deeper null (with the reduction in ban
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00231.html (9,030 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:05:15 -0500
The lowest loss cable I have here is 75 Ohm 1" General Cable Fused Disc; its under a differnt name these days. Mostly air with poly discs and used for the 200' runs for 10M, 2M, and 222 MHz. For the
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00251.html (12,074 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:57:18 -0500
The proper ferrites work well down into any frequency you want, even LF. I use them into UHF as a way to keep 2 and 4 bay yagis from having distorted patterns that can kill a good F/B. Several A-B te
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00264.html (15,330 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:27:53 -0500
The lowest loss cable I have here is 75 Ohm 1" General Cable Fused Disc; its under a differnt name these days. Mostly air with poly discs and used for the 200' runs for 10M, 2M, and 222 MHz. For the
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00267.html (11,665 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: Palomar R-X Noise Bridge (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:31:54 -0500
Dielectric losses become evident at 2M with 1500W and at 432 400W of steady carrier will heat up even the best N connectors and RG-213. For that reason many are switching to the 7/16 DIN. That has no
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00276.html (12,416 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: Shunt feeding the Skyneedle - new developments (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:14:10 -0500
Im not concerned by what is measured at the matching unit or a miniscule cable loss; just what is transformed back to the amp and its ability to load at full power without arcing, running out of or h
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00381.html (17,392 bytes)

57. Re: Topband: Shunt feeding the Skyneedle - new developments (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:45:32 -0500
That 1.3 is only at ONE frequency Charlie, he is not crystal controlled. What is the 2:1 bandwidth at the amp? Carl KM1H -- Original Message -- From: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.co
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00386.html (18,285 bytes)

58. Re: Topband: Shunt feeding the Skyneedle - new developments (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:40:31 -0500
Charlie youre continually missing the point; ignore cable loss period. The only issue is what impedance does the amp see from lets say 1800 to 1900 KHz? AND can the amp load into it without a problem
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00389.html (20,441 bytes)

59. Re: Topband: Shunt feeding the Skyneedle - new developments (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 11:41:57 -0500
I suppose I missed that part while doing things around here but this is the only pertinent info I can find from him. Nowhere does it say he has a 1:1 anywhere with the cap in the cabinet. Granted som
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00392.html (23,789 bytes)

60. Re: Topband: Shunt feeding the Skyneedle - new developments (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 22:08:00 -0500
That is the type of report I really like to hear Carl. All that work has paid off in spades. As you increase the number of radials the VSWR bandwidth might decrease along with the R which is normal a
/archives//html/Topband/2014-02/msg00418.html (30,516 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu