Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@jeremy.mv.com: 165 ]

Total 165 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Optimal radial wire type and gauge? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:41:13 -0500
I use whatever I can find at the lowest cost which has been mostly #16 and 18 stranded and insulated in 500-1000' reels at a local surplus shop. Ive even used #22 when the other wasnt on hand and it
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00393.html (9,384 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: raised radials (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:12:04 -0500
A ground screen mesh extending out at least 25' from the base would reduces losses considerably since just 10-20 radials has little effect. At a prior QTH, going from 100 radials of 60-130' to spokes
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00394.html (8,409 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:09:35 -0500
Has anyone tried RG-8X PL-259 crimp connectors on RG-6? Carl KM1H Amphenol F connectors? Whoah! 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.b
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00429.html (10,968 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: GAP Vertical Question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 19:45:33 -0500
My own experience with 1/2 wave verticals is that they certainly do require a good ground. Maybe a rod in a saltwater marsh is sufficient but not in many other cases. Examples: A Shakespere CB whip i
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00430.html (11,565 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: raised radials (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:23:23 -0500
You ever wonder why a few on here are so much louder than their competition with similar installations when 1-2 keep trying to make us believe it has nothing to do with the radials beyond a small num
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00431.html (11,281 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: raised radials (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 11:51:34 -0500
-- Original Message -- From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com> To: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> Cc: <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:26 AM Subject: Re: Topband: raised radials Or t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00437.html (13,386 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: GAP Vertical Question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:16:15 -0500
Charlie, your starting to sound like the other guy; trying to interpet my posts and spin to your benefit and getting demeaning in the process. Give me a bit more credit than that...OK... I know a bit
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00446.html (16,405 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: raised radials (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:09:31 -0500
Charlie, you are so far off the wall Im not even going to bother with a long detailed answer since it likely wont go thru.You dont have a clue what Im trying to get across so why bother. There was ab
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00447.html (16,025 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: GAP Vertical Question (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:33:12 -0500
Right, typically a couple hundred ohms. Modeling the base Z of a thick broadcast tower is very difficult with MoM software. Changes in thickness can result in large base Z changes. Just to be clear,
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00470.html (11,666 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Ground mounted 1/2 wave (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:41:36 -0500
<<But doesn't this merely confirm the notion that the half-wave vertical needs some kind of ground system to work against, and in addition to minimise ground loss when the base of the radiator is in
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00494.html (15,607 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Ground mounted 1/2 wave (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:03:03 -0500
I guess I wasnt clear enough so lets start again. We both agree that the .38 db increase is at all elevation angles since the increase in efficiency at the feed doesnt change the pattern shape, just
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00501.html (13,069 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: BOG Antenna Measurements (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:51:47 -0500
I have been looking for information on BOGs and have not been able to find any info on measured impedance values. Other than they are low, depends on ground, etc. I thought I would relate my recent e
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00571.html (8,063 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: 160 puzzle (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 13:01:53 -0500
Post is pressure treated and has been outdoors a couple of years .Antenna is insulated with a PVC pipe sleeve .My hand does not effect it till I touch, if only 1/16 inch away .The effect is greater i
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00060.html (7,706 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: A 160 Meter antenne puzzle (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:58:29 -0500
Is it really necessary to isolate the vertical from the pressure treated 4 x 4 with PVC tubing and is it really necessary to install a 1:1 balun between the antenna and feedline in this 4-square rece
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00072.html (8,458 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: Reversible BOG? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 09:07:23 -0500
As a follow up I wonder if rather than using windowline, whose transmission line performance would be subject to variations in weather, it might be better to use coax. The outside of the shield would
/archives//html/Topband/2013-01/msg00082.html (7,913 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: New 160M high performance receiving antenna at W3LPL (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:05:26 -0500
There is one in Portugal also, dont remember how much is still standing, havent been there for almost 20 years. The US versions were the FRD-10 and the FLR-9 and built into the 70's and the Japanese
/archives//html/Topband/2013-02/msg00051.html (17,665 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Voltage along coax feeder (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:31:39 -0400
Check the Ameritron RCS-4 circuit. Selects 4 antennas with voltages over the coax. Requires relays with excellent isolation for Beverages, the RCS-4 is poor and I eventually built my own with DIP siz
/archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00143.html (7,924 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Problem with compression F connectors on Quad RG-6 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 12:03:14 -0400
CATV installers use almost 100% quad shield in order to keep the signals inside and not cause interfering leakage (egress); FCC specs are adamant about that. These specs go back to the 70's. In more
/archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00034.html (13,887 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: Problem with compression F connectors on Quad RG-6 (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 12:24:19 -0400
But if you deploy bad cable and hardware into a system, you'll feel the pain a long time as it affects long-term service call volume, unhappy customers, and angry government leaders who generally hat
/archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00035.html (10,129 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: Magnetic Loops (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 16:19:41 -0400
Actually a properly designed purpose built loop can offer a reduction in noise from the high Q selectivity offered. A 2 turn balanced loop made from 1" mostly air dielectric CATV hardline has been in
/archives//html/Topband/2013-05/msg00153.html (11,624 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu