Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kb1grs@joelweber.org: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: kb1grs@joelweber.org (Joel N. Weber II)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:20 2003
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01324.html (6,286 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Re: Fw: VHFcontesting, Get A Grip! (score: 1)
Author: kb1grs@joelweber.org (Joel N. Weber II)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003
Sure. Or perhaps to attract more participants. I'd actually kind of like to see the exchange be different on every band. If I've successfully made a contact on one band, and then move to another ban
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01335.html (11,905 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Get A Grip! (score: 1)
Author: kb1grs@joelweber.org (Joel N. Weber II)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003
Did the person you talked to at the League understand that the APRS packets would be sent out in a form such that they wouldn't be digipeated? I'd always thought that the spirit of that rule was tha
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01350.html (8,966 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: kb1grs@joelweber.org (Joel N. Weber II)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
It's not clear that a rig with all the features you describe would end up being the most cost-effective solution for a multiop station, since multiop stations frequently want a single radio for each
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01961.html (8,772 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu