- 1. Topband: Inverted L Dimensions (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:21:31 -0400
- I have decided to take the plunge and put up a simple antenna for 160M. Several comments: It has to be simple and not excessively expensive; I have limited room for antennas on my lot, and very limit
- /archives//html/Topband/2010-09/msg00058.html (7,323 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:36:25 -0500
- I have a Gap Titan. As the other people indicate it is not as good as a whole variety of other antennas. It is only good for 80 and up. I find that it works fairly well on 40 and 20M. Do I get stompe
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00312.html (10,936 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: Fw: GAP VERTICAL QUESTION (score: 1)
- Author: "Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:28:08 -0500
- Personally, I use an 80 M loop - I like it especially for stateside contest like Sweep or FD. Nice solid signal on 40M and 80M. It does much better than the Titan. But the Titan is much less maintena
- /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00335.html (11,392 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: Anybody? (score: 1)
- Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 13:04:13 -0500
- I like your RBN testing - nice idea. I wonder if the process could be automated to some extent by using WSPR. By proper programing you could alternate antennas. Might be an interesting to try. This w
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00007.html (11,821 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Anybody? (score: 1)
- Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 13:58:29 -0500
- Typically there are quite a few, and over time it would build up data points. Since WSPR is a weak signal mode, the antenna question is moot. A simple script might be able to be able to be written to
- /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00009.html (9,407 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu