Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6nc@saciplaw.com: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] More Rules = More Controversy - Again (score: 1)
Author: "R. Michael West" <k6nc@saciplaw.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:59:14 +0000
I agree Steve. The new rules (among other things): (1) put the Unlimiteds in their own Class, where they belong; (2) put some reasonable contraints on the standard Rover Class by limiting the extent
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00051.html (9,224 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Northern California 432 Net - Moved To Sunday Night (score: 1)
Author: "R. Michael West" <k6nc@saciplaw.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:45:39 +0000
Hello All: Please be advised that the Northern California 432 Net has moved to Sunday Night 7:00 PM Local Time. Frequency is the same: 432.100 MHZ. Early check-ins at 6:45-7:00 PM. Hope to see you al
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00086.html (7,112 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] More Roving (score: 1)
Author: "R. Michael West" <k6nc@saciplaw.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 05:17:03 +0000
James: We agree with you that the Limited Rover class was not necessarily intended for beginners, although it does provide an entry level class in terms of equipment/power limitations. Personally, I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00044.html (12,021 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules (score: 1)
Author: "R. Michael West" <k6nc@saciplaw.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 02:00:00 +0000
I like the new rules, and the clarification regarding the Limited Rover class. Thank you ARRL and the hard working people who made it possible. There is a good reason for keeping the Limited Rover cl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00256.html (10,697 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] How many people are affected by the new rule change? (score: 1)
Author: "R. Michael West" <k6nc@saciplaw.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:00:04 +0000
Nice factual analysis Duffy, and thankfully lacking the unnecessary hysteria of earlier postings. 73, Mike K6NC Rather than speculate, it is interesting to see who this affects. January 2008 VHF cont
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00359.html (10,188 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Logging Rovers in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "R. Michael West" <k6nc@saciplaw.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 00:10:50 +0000
No, operating as a Rover doesn't change your call, but it does change your status as a station. So that when you work the same station twice on the same band, you had better be in a different grid. O
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00066.html (13,958 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Roving in one grid ? (score: 1)
Author: "R. Michael West" <k6nc@saciplaw.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 01:57:03 +0000
If this change were made to Section 2.5: "....who move in or among one or more grid squares.......", I believe this issue would be resolved. That's for those who think it may be necessary. Personally
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00131.html (10,652 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu