Mail Archive Search: <+from:k5iua@earthlink.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k5iua@earthlink.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Fw: [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence... (score: 1): Author: John Godwin <k5iua@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:31:38 +0000; Hello folk's The rules are explicit. A rover can use only one call sign. A family station is not a rover station and vice versa. There is no other interpretation that can be construed from the follow; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00041.html (9,056 bytes)
2. Re: Fw: [VHFcontesting] Re: Rule precedence... (score: 1): Author: John Godwin <k5iua@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 23:46:19 +0000; Hello Mike, JK and others I believe the statement in General Rules for All ARRl Contests 3.5 "except for family stations where more than one call has been issued" is misunderstood. When the FCC issue; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00055.html (8,662 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] "highly undesireable practices" (score: 1): Author: John Godwin <k5iua@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 01:46:56 +0000; The MSC/PSC has determined that grid circling and or captive rovers are "highly undesirable practices". How can that be when for years rule number one has been "1. Object: To work as many amateur sta; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00209.html (11,051 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]