Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4oaq@mindspring.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4oaq@mindspring.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Question abt gain in bi- vs uni-directional Beverage (score: 1): Author: k4oaq@mindspring.com (Fritz Reuning); Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 22:04:56 -0500; I've got 2 - 160M "Beverage's" (they're only abt 1/4 wavelength long). In the Dec 160 contest the noise was abt s9 with my inv L and s1 or 2 with the terminated Beverages (NE and West from Southwest; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00029.html (9,446 bytes)
2. Topband: Answers abt gain in bi- vs uni-directional Beverage (score: 1): Author: k4oaq@mindspring.com (Fritz Reuning K4OAQ); Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:26:05 -0500; Thanks to all for the great answers. Let me try to summarize. When I asked my question I was kinda balled up with my terminology. What I was trying to ask was, would I lose readability of a barely re; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00046.html (10,055 bytes)
3. Topband: RE: BOG antenna notes (score: 1): Author: k4oaq@mindspring.com (Fritz Reuning K4OAQ); Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:33:42 -0500; Dan, I've got a couple 260ft terminated Beverages that are abt 5ft high. Several weeks ago, Earl, K6SE, was nice enuf to do a little analysis with EZNEC. What he discovered was that a 260 BOG (Bevera; /archives//html/Topband/2001-01/msg00186.html (8,019 bytes)
4. Topband: What's best way to connect a beverage to an ICOM 765? (score: 1): Author: k4oaq@mindspring.com (Fritz Reuning); Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:12:24 -0500; I have some rather simple questions that I feel sure have been addressed previously. If someone could point me to an approximate date in the archives, I'd be more than happy to search thru them. I as; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00000.html (6,858 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]