Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dpease@adams.net: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] UHF contest (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net (Danny Pease)
Date: Mon Jul 28 22:43:49 2003
I have a similiar question, how about trees? The 55 element loop yagi at N9JF is at 57' but there are fence rows full of trees over 65' tall in a couple of directions. The trees are pretty dense foli
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00234.html (8,919 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Re: Captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net (dpease@adams.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 08:28:23 2003
It states "...operating practices..." Danny NG9R Danny Pease dpease@adams.net ....................................................... Sent using Adams WebMail -- http://webmail.adams.net Adams NetWor
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00242.html (10,290 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Re: Captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net (dpease@adams.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 09:39:00 2003
I can't say I expect anyone to operate beyond their limits of comfort for any contest, much less as a driver of a vehicle where there are multiple safety issues. That said, I am sure there are diehar
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00247.html (12,418 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Re: captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net (dpease@adams.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 09:55:25 2003
My limited experience here in the "Black Hole" (even worse in VHF test) with rovers is limited, but all I have heard on are not "captive" and many times provide the only contact in several grids on m
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00251.html (11,155 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] What happened? (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net (Danny Pease)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Just checking if the reflector is still working, I haven't gotten anything in several days (weeks). Danny NG9R
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00011.html (6,219 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] June VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net (dpease@adams.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:09 2003
Please look for our multi-op effort this weekend from EM49. We hope to activate 6 through 432 and 1296. The call will be N9JF. Danny NG9R ....................................................... Sent
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00767.html (6,826 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] NG9R June contest plans (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net (Danny Pease)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:53 2003
N9JF and myself will again to operate from Jim's station in EM49 this weekend, using my call, NG9R. We will be on most of the weekend on 6, 2, 220, 432 and 1296. We plan (hope) to have WSJT running (
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02031.html (6,820 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Re: 6 and 2 meter antenna question (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net (dpease@adams.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:49 2003
Hence the Quagi design by N6NB years ago. K4VX had a killer multi-element triband quad years ago but gave it up for bigger yagis. One big advantage to the quad was much less rain static. It would be
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02318.html (9,975 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] What happened? (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net (Danny Pease)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:49 2003
Just checking if the reflector is still working, I haven't gotten anything in several days (weeks). Danny NG9R
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2001-08/msg00012.html (6,216 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] 432 collinear array setup (score: 1)
Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:33:15 -0500
The second layout would give you a slightly narrower, taller pattern than the first. I remember a local using 160 elements on 144 for his EME array. It covered a lot of real estate but worked very we
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-09/msg00089.html (9,878 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] Re: A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps [was: Asuggestion forERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:06:58 GMT
How about a just rolling everyone that uses more than 4 bands into one big class, regardless of power? That should even the field out quite a bit. NG9R Ev Tupis (W2EV) writes: In reply to W2EV, "Kenn
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00080.html (13,405 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] Re: Choice of Rover Vehicles (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 01:01:27 GMT
I am looking at a pickup to pull my race car trailer and after having the old Suburban for so many years, I cannot go back to the small confines of a standard truck cab. I also do several mobile oper
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00002.html (10,204 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] Re: ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:45:35 GMT
I agree with these statements and would like to see 222 used more casusaly, plus more activity in contests. Where I am, there is no activity outside of the few contests a operate a year. I would love
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00094.html (9,336 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] Re: COST OF 432 AND HIGHER (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:21:51 GMT
I wasn't able to justify new stuff to add bands above 432 so by using a little patience and keeping my ears open, I was able to add 1296 for about $500, including a new 55 element loop yagi, 1 5/8 fe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00139.html (9,320 bytes)

15. RE: [VHFcontesting] Still time for comments on rules changes (score: 1)
Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:55:45 -0600
So, is the intent to restrict the VHF contests to VHF only and do away with the UHF contest? Let's see, BPL threatens to eat at HF bandwidth and the ARRL is open to suggestions to do away with the op
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00055.html (10,170 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] Arrl VHf contesting changes and monkey buisness (score: 1)
Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:54:50 -0000
I see from the NEWSVHF reflector that the committee has submitted their report, does anyone know where to find a link to it on the web? Danny NG9R show again. are pages. subcommittee ________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00081.html (9,871 bytes)

17. [VHFcontesting] Re: Cross Mode communication (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:46:26 -0500
I wouldn't think of passing up a cross mode contact, QSO's are too hard to come by. I seem to catch several each contest, both while on SSB and CW. Sometimes I can't quite make out a call of a statio
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-08/msg00038.html (9,087 bytes)

18. [VHFcontesting] Re: Cross Mode communication (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:10:19 -0500
One of my pet peeves about Icom radios is using the lower sideband in CW mode. I wish all the manufacture's would do cw just the same as SSB, above 10 MHz (including VHF+) use USB. My 706 is a real p
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-08/msg00045.html (10,949 bytes)

19. [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903 (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 11:39:00 -0500
Personally, I see advantages to using 145 over 144 for the IF, especially at stations where there are more than one transverter using 2 meters for an IF. I would think you would want the option of us
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00014.html (9,925 bytes)

20. [VHFcontesting] phasing antennas (score: 1)
Author: dpease@adams.net
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 09:13:29 -0500
How critical do you get when making phasing lines for stacking antennas? I am ready to put up a pair of 1296 loop yagis and am curious how accurate the phasing lines need to be (in degrees). Danny NG
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00058.html (6,545 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu