Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@ctc.net: 512 ]

Total 512 documents matching your query.

361. TopBand: HEARD ISLAND MESSAGE # 94 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 07:01:50 -0500 (EST)
To: <topband@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com Sponsored by Akorn Acce
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00004.html (10,067 bytes)

362. TopBand: Wise Up! (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 15:06:23 -0500 (EST)
Recently we are getting another rash of needless posts. Exactly what does juno.com have to do with 160 and why are 5 responses made to the reflector which should have gone direct to the original send
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00029.html (7,977 bytes)

363. TopBand: N5KO's 160 report from the woods (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 14:15:12 -0500 (EST)
-- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com Sponsored by Akorn Access, Inc & N4VJ / K4AAA
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00047.html (7,238 bytes)

364. TopBand: S21XX via Long Path! (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 18:38:37 -0500 (EST)
Wow! First I see on OH2BUA that VE1ZZ logged him at 2204, then I got a call from Jeff telling me that he worked him out of the Northeast. I start listening that direction and just begin to hear a tra
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00050.html (7,304 bytes)

365. TopBand: EX8W's habits (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 22:30:44 -0500 (EST)
I noticed several European spots of EX8W the past week around 0200 UTC. Last night I heard him on 1828.8 calling CQ and, after many calls, I made a marginal QSO at 0225 but was not sure he had my cal
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00056.html (7,060 bytes)

366. TopBand: Propagation Forecast (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1997 06:12:26 -0500 (EST)
Wow, two new ones here within 24 hours (EX8W and S21XX), both on very difficult paths. As K1ZM said "It doesn't get any better than this!" Enjoy because these fantastic conditions will not last forev
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00062.html (8,421 bytes)

367. TopBand: Messages to 9X4WW (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 14:59:48 -0500 (EST)
Guys, please stop using the reflector to send messages to individuals. 9X4WW is not a subscriber to the reflector since he does not want a lot of messages cluttering his mailbox. He is sending messag
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00132.html (6,804 bytes)

368. TopBand: Content reminder! (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 11:51:02 -0500 (EST)
Gentlemen: Enough of the whining! This only generates more comments which do nothing but waste space here. If you want to pontificate, complain, criticize, rebut the complainer, etc., please go elsew
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00164.html (6,992 bytes)

369. TopBand: Propagation Forecast (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 07:01:53 -0500 (EST)
Gentlemen, please keep the discussion of poor operating practices off of the reflector. I have a lot of opinions also but this is NOT the forum to vent them! If we let this reflector degenerate into
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00193.html (9,076 bytes)

370. TopBand: 10 rules for pileup success on 160 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 12:16:25 -0500 (EST)
Rather than complain about the pileup behavior, let me share a few tips for working a pileup on Topband for those who think continuous calling is the way to do it (sadly, some are suggesting to me th
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00198.html (9,288 bytes)

371. TopBand: V5 Operation Details (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 16:57:37 -0500 (EST)
The following from the OPDX Bulletin explains the fantastic signal the guys put out from their V5 operation. A dipole up 1/2 wavelengths works well on any band...it's just too bad it is out of reach
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00234.html (7,060 bytes)

372. TopBand: W4ZV ARRL DX CW 160 SOHP Story (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 15:20:07 -0500 (EST)
Single op 160 score: 44,823 points (223 Q's and 67 countries) This was my first contest with omnidirectional 160 transmitting and receiving antennas since I left Colorado in 1993. Sure is nice to be
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00251.html (9,996 bytes)

373. TopBand: Propagation Forecast (score: 1)
Author: btippett@ctc.net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 06:44:07 -0500 (EST)
Prepared by the U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Environment Center Twenty-seven Day Outlook Issued 18 Feb 1997 UT Radio Flux Planetary Largest Date 10.7 cm A Index Kp Index 19 Feb 97 73 15 3 20 F
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00279.html (7,985 bytes)

374. TopBand: PLEASE No More QSL Routes! (score: 1)
Author: btippett@ctc.net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 13:21:57 -0500 (EST)
Please use some common sense! There are plenty of other sources for QSL info. I can understand someone like LY1DS who has a particular problem QSL, but some are abusing the intended use of this refle
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00288.html (7,094 bytes)

375. TopBand: QSL info on Internet (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 22:46:45 -0500 (EST)
GW3YDX informs me that the DX reflector is also trying to discourage the use of that reflector for QSL info. My apologies to Lyndon because I was not aware of that since I'm not a user. Here are a co
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00292.html (8,030 bytes)

376. TopBand: P29VXX now QRV 160! (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 07:23:38 -0500 (EST)
Was tuning around this morning and suddenly heard "P29VXX, P29VXX" on 1826.5. First thought it was someone calling him but I called and it was Mar! He said I was his first QSO on 160 so now they must
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00316.html (6,874 bytes)

377. TopBand: New Topband Server and Software (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 16:35:00 -0500 (EST)
To all Topband@contesting.com readers: AD1C, KM3T, N4VJ & N5KO have each chipped in on a new server running Majordomo to support various ham-radio-related mailing lists, including Topband@contesting.
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00321.html (7,873 bytes)

378. TopBand: P29VXX on 160 (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1997 23:09:20 -0500 (EST)
Saturday morning I worked Mar on 80. He said he worked a couple of guys in the CQ 160 SSB but gave up due to the QRM. He promises to be on 160 again Monday morning after the contest for the East Coas
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00338.html (6,654 bytes)

379. TopBand: Contest Venting, Windows, etc. (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 22:33:39 -0500 (EST)
Enough already guys! I'm asking which of the posters on this issue would like to take the ball and will notify you so that you can forward comments to them offline for action. Please no more posts on
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00351.html (6,907 bytes)

380. TopBand: P29VXX Signal Today (score: 1)
Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 07:16:37 -0500 (EST)
Conditions were far down to P29VXX today. I heard him about 339 around 1145 which is about 15 minutes before my sunrise. After a brief QSY to 80, he returned around 1205 and is working JA's as I writ
/archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00356.html (6,877 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu