Mail Archive Search: <+from:bill>

Results:

References: [ +from:bill: 2775 ]

Total 2775 documents matching your query.

141. Topband: Help!! (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 13:41:24 +0100; I received the following messge from Paul ET3PMW (slightly edited): ** ** YOU all can help if you will begin acting like the gentlemen I hope most of you are. LISTEN AND DO NOT CALL if he is replying; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00121.html (9,623 bytes)
142. Topband: More on ET3PMW (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 18:06:59 +0100; The following stations have been worked on Topband by Paul ET3PMW as of 03 UTC 16 May 2002: A92ZE AA1K AJ1H EA6NB G3SNN G4OBK G4VGO IK4BEZ IK4GME IK4WMA IT9ZGY K1JJ K1VW K1ZM K2FU K3RR K3UL K4JMN K4Q; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00122.html (7,624 bytes)
143. Topband: 3/8 Wavelength Inverted-L (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:24:24 +0100; Didier, this is commonly called a 3/8 wavelength inverted-L (18m vertical and 44m horizontal). It was originally promoted by W1BB with the main advantage being that it makes a good match for 50 ohm c; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00126.html (8,248 bytes)
144. Topband: 3/8 Wavelength Inverted-L (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 18:23:02 +0100; the inverted L 1/2 wave is also a excellent ant. Why does the computer say the 1/4 L has a lower angle, maybe because the computer shows a perfect ground system with the 1/4. Jim, the NEC model assum; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00128.html (8,956 bytes)
145. Topband: Fine Crystal WRTC 2002 Candleholders Available (score: 1): Author: K1ZM@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 23:10:53 +0100; Dear Topbanders: Some of you may know that I am currently serving as one of the USA Fundraisers for WRTC 2002 in Helsinki, Finland. WRTC 2002 is the "Olympics of Ham Radio" contesting and over 50 tea; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00139.html (7,677 bytes)
146. Topband: ET3PMW Update (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 14:41:26 +0100; Update from Paul ET3PMW:; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00148.html (7,497 bytes)
147. Topband: Re: [PVRC] FCC issues NPRM on 5 MHz ham band (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 13:59:55 +0100; a comment period under which concerned parties may file comments and depending on the results of the comments the FCC will take final action. From the FCC's NPRM itself: Adopted: May 2, 2002: Release; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00161.html (11,346 bytes)
148. Topband: ET3PMW Update (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 10:41:02 +0100; Received the following update from Paul:; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00183.html (7,523 bytes)
149. Topband: GR-1606-B (score: 1): Author: wlakatos@nrao.edu (Bill Lakatosh); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 08:17:16 -0500; Hello Top Banders, This is my first post , so please bear with me. I'm a late comer to 160 meters but sure think I'm going to have lots of fun on this band. Sure wish I would have been on last night; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00002.html (7,482 bytes)
150. Topband: GR 1606 B (score: 1): Author: wlakatos@nrao.edu (Bill Lakatosh); Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 12:53:16 -0500; Thanks to all those that responded to my question. I really appreciate all of you taking the time and making the effort to respond. You have certainly helped me decide on the direction to take with m; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00004.html (6,274 bytes)
151. Topband: Help for ET3PMW (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 11:45:31 +0100; Hello Topbanders! Many of you remember Paul Wyse who has given many of us new ones from 5X4F and 5Z4FO. Paul is now at ET3PMW and should be there until June. He has just gotten a 260' dipole up, fed; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00017.html (7,318 bytes)
152. Topband: 10 rules for pileup success on 160 (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 17:15:39 +0000; It may be timely to repeat a post I made here 5 years ago. I especially caution all about #3 below: "Continuously calling only slows down the whole process and reduces YOUR probability of a QSO. It m; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00011.html (10,397 bytes)
153. Re; Topband: NR1DX - K3KY - Beacon DXing - Two Daves (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 21:41:45 +0000; Bernie brings up a point that is a bit of netiquette which I should explain. Many of you are doing two things you should reconsider to make life easier for all of us: 1. Please don't top post. This i; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00017.html (8,365 bytes)
154. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: W2pm@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>); Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 03:43:08 +0000; I've been wondering why the makers have long abandoned the slave receiver feature as on the TR4/R4 and S Line combos? The flexibility of two separate receivers coupled with a tight integration of eit; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00086.html (8,129 bytes)
155. Topband: TEN-TEC IS LISTENING! (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 11:41:29 +0000; I was also at the Charlotte Hamfest yesterday but I would not be so quick to judge what was obviously an early prototype. Ten-Tec is at least 6 months from production and they specifically mentioned; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00087.html (9,043 bytes)
156. Topband: MFJ power line noise receiver or alternatives? (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 03:41:11 +0000; Funny you should mention that since I just bought a MFJ-852 at the Charlotte Hamfest. Price was $85 before taxes. I've been having some noise problems recently and decided I needed to try one of thes; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00093.html (9,202 bytes)
157. Topband: Chain-link fence (score: 1): Author: btippett@alum.mit.edu (Bill Tippett); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:05:35 +0000; Hi Barrie, I would definitely connect to it or any other metal objects that are within 200' of your vertical. I don't see how it could hurt and it might help a bit. During contests when I was in Colo; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00097.html (6,931 bytes)
158. Topband: Ducie Island Update (score: 1): Author: Bill Hellman" <vze27322@verizon.net (Bill Hellman); Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:24:05 -0000; The main frequencies for this operation are 21.020 for CW and 21.295 for SSB twenty-four hours a day. Note, please, that the expedition will have both fifteen meter frequencies QRV at the same time.; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00098.html (6,933 bytes)
159. Topband: Reactance problem (score: 1): Author: Billg@warwick.net (Bill Gerhold); Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:47:24 -0500; Why would the reactance change on a ground mounted vertical for no apparent reason. I used to get a resonance point at 1.840mhz. Lowest SWR was at 1.850. All was fine until about 1 month ago. Checkin; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00112.html (7,988 bytes)
160. Topband: TA3J on 160SSB on 16/17 Mar (score: 1): Author: n4ji@firstva.com (BILL MCNEIL); Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:08:02 -0000; Hi Fellow Static Eaters: Received an E-mail from Berkin TA3J. He will be QRV on 16/17 March = between 0230z and 0500z on 1843 to 1850kHz looking for USA and Canada. His QSL mgr is TA3YJ (his XYL). Wo; /archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00114.html (6,524 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]