Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W9UCW@aol.com: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: Stew Perry TBDC changes being considered (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:18:48 EST
Stew Perry TBDC changes being considered Don't mess with success... Leave it alone. Barry W9UCW _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00197.html (8,223 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Popularity of Topband in JA land (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:15:20 EST
Does anyone have a feel for how popular 160 really is in JA? If I were to assess that from my JA 160 experience I'd say there aren't any ! ;< To W2PM, I guess Louis gave a good feel for the answer to
/archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00252.html (7,429 bytes)

23. Topband: FK8CP on TB (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:01:39 EST
Arunas asked: "Any info on his further activities on TB?" I have copied Remi, FK8CP most every morning for the last week... sometimes not well enough to call and be sure of who he's answering. I usua
/archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00274.html (7,211 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: K6SE (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 21:21:06 EDT
Rest in peace, Earl. We were friends a long time, but the important thing is that you defined the term " Gentleman" on the Gentleman's band. 73 forever, Barry, W9UCW ** See what's free at http://www.
/archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00025.html (6,463 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: "Still life in the band" (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:38:29 EDT
Hi Paul and Raoul, I agree, although listening to the east from here in the evening has been particularly punishing this spring/summer. The racket seems worse than usual, but maybe it's me. Reminds m
/archives//html/Topband/2007-06/msg00048.html (8,018 bytes)

26. Topband: overcoming qrn (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:29:59 EST
To Jim, W5QM: After 54 years on 160 I've reconciled myself to the fact that age is the best QRN fighter. You see, "hardening of the arteries" sets in, and simultaneously your eardrums begin to turn t
/archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00089.html (6,860 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Cage Vertical Worth It? (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 14:08:57 EDT
Re: Cage Vertical Worth It? Hi Dan, The vertical we used in Channahon Illinois in the 80's was built around a 120' tower sitting on busbar insulators with insulated guys. It had a 13 to 60 mHz conica
/archives//html/Topband/2008-05/msg00009.html (9,853 bytes)

28. Topband: 160 Meter Propagation (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 06:44:57 EST
The Reflector postings on this subject have always been enlightening to me. I've never been strong on this subject and I tend to pay close attention to what everyone says. In terms of recent postings
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00116.html (9,563 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: [Dx-qsl] Claiming 160m DXCC - Sending QSLs (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:26:45 EDT
My advice... Forget all that crap, get on the air and work what you can. I realize that we all have egos if we are alive... but as Abraham Maslow stated in his "Hierarchy of Human Needs," it is easil
/archives//html/Topband/2009-05/msg00128.html (9,340 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: 160/M---Time for a new topic--- 160mobile?! (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:11:57 EDT
Starting in 1954 I ran 160 mobile off and on for more than 50 years. Even did a lot of hidden transmitter hunts on 160 in the Chicago area with the "Chiburban Radio Mobileers. Check out their website
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00483.html (8,774 bytes)

31. Topband: . Re: 160 metre vertical with 'top loading' (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:39:33 EDT
This subject comes up often. That should be no surprise. It's very important to those who need to load shortened monopoles, and there is a great deal of conflict in the available literature on the su
/archives//html/Topband/2011-04/msg00136.html (10,222 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: Effect of current max not at base of vertical (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 21:17:44 -0400 (EDT)
This may or may not be significant to the discussion. In the 1970's I was using a 120 foot insulated base vertical as my main transmit antenna. I had 12,000 feet of #12 copper radials from 90 to 200
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00130.html (7,892 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 107, Issue 28 (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 22:45:37 -0500 (EST)
In a message dated 11/19/2011 2:00:52 P.M. Central Standard Time, topband-request@contesting.com writes: K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net You know Guy, your diatribes are a sure cure for insomnia. I have
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00167.html (8,192 bytes)

34. Topband: Subject: My First DX (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:46:42 -0500 (EST)
Congrats, Gene, Your post reminded me and I remember the feeling well. It was in the mid 50's. I had a WW2 surplus Hammarlund Super Pro receiver but it only covered 3 to 20 MHz. For 160 I used an old
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00246.html (7,280 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Caged Inv-L - Pros and Cons ? (Dan Bookwalter) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:25:15 -0500 (EST)
During the 1980's we had a 120 foot, insulated base tower with an appropriate radial system. I wanted to improve it's performance and increase its bandwidth. I also wanted to add an 11 foot conical m
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00321.html (7,613 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: PACER99@aol.com Subject: understanding 160 meter propagation (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:06:31 -0500 (EST)
It sounds like classic "spotlight propagation," Larry. Happens a lot on 160. I feel lucky to have experienced it several times over the last 58 years on topband. The most memorable one for me occurre
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00383.html (7,616 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: T vert feed (Roy) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:22:22 -0500 (EST)
Roy, you said: <"Whaaat??? Where did that 1.7 ohm figure come from....space?"> Three cheers for you!!! And for Jeff! I was beginning to think that everyone was joining in a conspiracy of silence so t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00385.html (7,488 bytes)

38. Topband: I was just curious.... (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:56:07 -0400 (EDT)
After reading all the comments about the end of the 160 season, I wondered how many DX contacts I make in the "off season." I'm not very consistent in my operating habits and although I often "check
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00259.html (8,619 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: Small loop Performance (Clay Melhorn) (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:14:12 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Clay, Long time no see... When I lived in Minooka in the 60's & 70's our old friend from Kankakee who was with the TV cable company fixed me up with a lot of "scraps" of half inch and one inch 75
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00105.html (10,031 bytes)

40. Topband: Antarctica (score: 1)
Author: W9UCW@aol.com
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:44:10 -0400 (EDT)
During the discussion of various 160 Antarctic operations did anyone mention AZ5ZA? In loading old logbooks in a new logging program I came across a couple contacts with them in late 1983 and January
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00047.html (7,212 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu