Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W4EF@dellroy.com: 302 ]

Total 302 documents matching your query.

261. Re: Topband: 7P8LB in the Capital of lightning (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 21:11:09 -0700
Rune I made a recording of what you sounded like on the night of March 15 (UTC) in California. My receive antenna was nothing special - just some unknown combination of my transmit antenna (55 ft top
/archives//html/Topband/2019-03/msg00089.html (11,982 bytes)

262. Re: Topband: Relationship Between Ground Wave and Low-Angle Radiation (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 10:02:12 -0700
On 9/13/2019 6:31 AM, N4ZR wrote: I don't think I've ever read anything on this topic.  Basically, what I'm asking is, could ground wave to a fairly nearby Skimmer be used as an analogue to low-angle
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00063.html (8,549 bytes)

263. Re: Topband: COSMIC RAY UPDATE (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 12:19:41 -0800
During the last minimum, there were times when high northern latitude stations in zone 17 and 18 would be very strong for long periods of time here in southern California. Last Sunday morning during
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00119.html (8,723 bytes)

264. Re: Topband: 160 conditions (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:30:12 -0800
Thanks for coming back to me, Tom. The only reason I knew the band was open is that I was sitting on 1821.0 listening for S01WS who had been spotted there. Apparently he was gone because, Eric NO3M,
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00150.html (7,885 bytes)

265. Re: Topband: Measuring Common Mode Chokes (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 11:09:18 -0800
Recently I've been discussing common mode chokes with others who have a different methodology. They prefer to do a transmission test through the choke and report the "common mode rejection". This is
/archives//html/Topband/2019-12/msg00221.html (9,635 bytes)

266. Re: Topband: 160m VP8PJ (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:09:28 -0800
I was hearing them 339 to 559 this evening around 0730 UTC. I may have actually worked them. I could tell they came back right away when I called them, but the QSB buried their reply. After a couple
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00223.html (13,426 bytes)

267. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 21:39:48 -0700
What matters is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Take the canonical example of an ideal 2-port Wilkinson power combiner with in-phase coherent signals of 10 Vrms applied to each input along with 1 Vr
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00125.html (17,272 bytes)

268. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:37:02 -0700
Hi Lee, Yes, if you are combining coherent signals that are not in phase, then the each of the voltage vectors is weighted by cos(phi-i) where phi-i is the angle between the i-th voltage vector and t
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00134.html (20,549 bytes)

269. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 13:47:52 -0700
There are a lot of SMT to DIP adapter boards out there which would allow newer SMD op-amps to be used in older through-hole PWB layouts. https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/aries-electronics/LC
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00135.html (19,330 bytes)

270. Re: Topband: Hi Z amplifiers for 160m (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 04:34:26 -0700
I agree with your conclusions regarding the case of isotropic atmospheric noise. This is the same reason that cold space looks like 3 Kelvin regardless of how high the antenna gain. As the antenna ga
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00143.html (15,253 bytes)

271. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:46:33 -0700
Steve, Couple of questions to rule out gain distribution issues: 1) On the sense antenna input do you have the pre-amp turned on or off? 2) Is your sense antenna intrinsically inefficient like a beve
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00168.html (9,215 bytes)

272. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 11:54:29 -0700
Another pitfall that you have to be careful to avoid with the MFJ-1026 is making sure the level of the QRN you are trying null that is coming out of the sense antenna isn't much lower in amplitude th
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00171.html (10,785 bytes)

273. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 13:36:16 -0700
Hi Mike, Yeah, when the off-air noise floor is a lot higher than the thermal noise floor from the JFET pre-amps, the imbalance I was alluding to wouldn't typically impact the overall noise floor sinc
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00174.html (11,939 bytes)

274. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 15:15:13 -0700
Dave is that -112 dBm you calculated the output referred noise? If so, what is the gain behind it? Thanks, 73, Mike W4EF....... 1.8 MHz, 50 nV/Hz^0.5 7.0 MHz, 26 nV/Hz^0.5 14 MHz, 19 nV/Hz^0.5 28 MHz
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00177.html (10,589 bytes)

275. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 07:06:43 -0700
I just happen to have a spare MFJ-1026 at home. I did a real quick test using my FT1000MP MK-V while powering the MFJ-1026 from an Astron supply. Similar to your results, Steve, I got about a 12 to 1
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00211.html (11,099 bytes)

276. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:13:37 -0700
You were spot on, Dave. Thanks for the suggestion. I rechecked the numbers this morning and the AUX (i.e. sense antenna path) gain varies about 2dB as a function of where the phase control is set. It
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00229.html (16,875 bytes)

277. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:23:55 -0700
Hi Mike, I was trying to address the particulars of N2IC's situation which involved the higher HF bands (although at this point in the sunspot cycle, perhaps I should have included 20 meters). Readin
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00230.html (11,682 bytes)

278. Re: Topband: Slightly OT - amplifier noise (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 08:30:52 -0700
Roger, When you checked for increased noise on 10 and 15 meters, did you have your radio set for maximum sensitivity and were the main and AUX input ports of the MFJ-1025 terminated with 50 ohms (or
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00232.html (9,318 bytes)

279. Re: Topband: Ground Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 19:46:31 -0700
Dan, Reading that QRZ.com thread you linked to and reflecting on K4SAV's measurements and how much they appeared to vary over a fairly short period of time, got me wondering about what could be respo
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00323.html (10,320 bytes)

280. Re: Topband: 160m Conditions for the CQ WW SSB (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:57:16 -0700
I heard JH4UYB on Sunday morning calling CQ on SSB with a good signal, but he couldn't copy me. I believe he was operating above the FT8 segment, but I don't recall his exact frequency. 73, Mike W4EF
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00162.html (8,556 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu