Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:PaulKB8N@aol.com: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: paulkb8n@aol.com
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:18:56 EST
The guy who has the record this year, I believe, is Jim, W5JAW, in five hours! Incredibly, Jim did this with Low Power to a 12 FOOT VERTICAL !!! Can anyone top that?! Paul, K5AF In a message dated 12
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00178.html (8,797 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Europrean SDR on 160M (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:09:42 EST
Frank, I certainly can see both possibilities and pitfalls with remote receivers. The odd thing is that if SDRs were used at both ends of the conversation, you might be able to work DX any time of da
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00319.html (12,851 bytes)

23. Topband: Spiral Top Hat 160M Vertical (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:30:10 EST
Gang, I just finished constructing and "hanging" my spiral top vertical antenna on a high tree limb. Here are some of the specifics: - 16 turns of #14 dull gray coated wire on a 4'x4' tophat, turns s
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00334.html (8,647 bytes)

24. Topband: Antennex DVD (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:19:00 -0500 (EST)
Fellow Topbanders, I've been pouring through the indexes for the last several years of Antennex, and was wondering if there was a consensus on this forum regarding the value of this media for topband
/archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00057.html (6,829 bytes)

25. Topband: 160M Helical Vertical (score: 1)
Author: paulkb8n <paulkb8n@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:41:00 -0500
I've read a lot about the K6MM vertical and may be forced to go that route, as the Neighborhood Association has received some complaints on my current 160M dipole and I may be forced to remove it. So
/archives//html/Topband/2011-03/msg00086.html (7,744 bytes)

26. Topband: Perimeter Elevated Ground System Wire? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:23:45 -0400 (EDT)
Gang, I have a clear area about 31' by 31' to put up a short 160M vertical this Fall. I am planning on putting up a 40' top loaded vertical in the center of this box with an elevated ground system 8'
/archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00019.html (7,261 bytes)

27. Re: Topband: Vertical for 160/80? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:11:59 -0400 (EDT)
Jerry, The Cushcraft MA-160V vertical happens to be 35' tall. I believe there is a capacitance hat at 23' with an inductor of unknown value just under the hat. The hat spokes are 48" and there are 8
/archives//html/Topband/2011-10/msg00191.html (9,232 bytes)

28. Topband: Seasonal Deployable Ground System (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:41:08 -0400 (EDT)
Many topbanders pull their radials up at the end of the Topband season in the Spring, and re-deploy them in the Fall. I've tried laying thin-wire radials and have had troubles with the dog catching h
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00007.html (9,166 bytes)

29. Re: Topband: Hindering factors in the science of back yard 160m vertical inst... (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 13:42:30 -0400 (EDT)
Guy, Brilliant piece of work! I don't think we can fully comprehend or completely model all the factors involved in 160M operation. If this proves difficult in an open setting, imagine trying it in s
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00019.html (24,136 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: An observation about Topband contesting technique (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:27:56 -0500 (EST)
I'm also sure that you cannot equate signal strength between stations in the same general vicinity. I've heard and worked stations that others in the area couldn't, and vice-versa. Not an unusual phe
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00119.html (9,315 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: Half or Quarter Wave?? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 00:30:26 -0500 (EST)
Before doing anything else, consider a more robust tuner at the base, that is a high-current area whether the antenna is 1/2 or 3/8 WL. A simple L network tuner with a #12 or #14 air-wound inductor a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00086.html (8,130 bytes)

32. Topband: Your Thoughts on Antenna Design (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:33:47 -0500 (EST)
I've always had a problem trying to hang an inverted L across my lot, as I have many trees, but only a couple that are about 40' high, and they are in close proximity of each other. I do run an inver
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00172.html (7,555 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: Wideband Balun...? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:29:38 -0400 (EDT)
The Heathkit Balun is not robust at all, the coils are close-spaced and made with #18 or #20 wire. I had one as a young ham in the 60s and was quite disappointed with the physical construction. I'd n
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00326.html (8,336 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: Vertical dipoles in the real world (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:39:05 -0400 (EDT)
Jim, I put up a short vertical dipole for 40M. It is 25' tall and has top and bottom X-shaped capacitive hats that are 42.5" square with a perimeter wire attached. The lower capacitive hat is about 6
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00208.html (10,030 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Vertical dipoles in the real world (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:12:03 -0400 (EDT)
Here is some fresh data on my Vertical Dipole versus my Double Zepp. This was run last night and is typical of the reams of comparison data that I've accumulated on 40M. My methodology: I find a clea
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00222.html (15,677 bytes)

36. Re: Topband: Ground Screens - Another Small Space Option (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:02:04 -0400 (EDT)
tests. Perhaps he might chime in here with some comments. Rob is NC0B. I cited his work in my first post on this. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QS
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00260.html (9,112 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: Ground Screens - Another Small Space Option (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:23:43 -0400 (EDT)
Rudy's latest article on small vertical efficiency for 600M, published this July, is very timely and reinforces some of the discussions we've had. Read and enjoy! _http://rudys.typepad.com/files/600m
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00274.html (9,616 bytes)

38. Topband: Perimeter Wires, Fat Radials...thoughts? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:13:12 -0400 (EDT)
I've had very good success with a 24' end-loaded vertical dipole on 40M. I'm wondering how principles that I've used there might apply to 160 and 80M. First of all, end hats can be quite small and st
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00210.html (7,877 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu