Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K3BU@aol.com: 92 ]

Total 92 documents matching your query.

81. TopBand: IG9/IV3TAN in CQ WW Phone (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 12:35:01 -0500
While operating in CQ WW Phone on 160 m this year, I could not help noticing absolutely incredible signal form IG9/IV3TAN. I have not experienced anything like it in my 38 years of contesting. He wou
/archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00136.html (8,632 bytes)

82. TopBand: IG9/IV3TAN response - summary (long) (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 23:38:13 -0500
IG9/IV3TAN We received some comments and description of IG9 operation from the "horses" mouth - operators at IG9 - IV3TAN and I4UFH. If, as Albert says, he ran Yaesu FL2100Z amplifier (into the anten
/archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00164.html (21,575 bytes)

83. TopBand: Hill vs. Ocean QTH - response summary (long) (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 23:44:50 -0500
Hill vs. Ocean QTH Those are the notes I have received after posting the Hill vs. Ocean QTH, which is better? We know that on VHF the hill is the answer. For low bands, this is not that clear and has
/archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00165.html (18,143 bytes)

84. TopBand: More on IG9 - Lampedusa Isl. (long) (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 09:44:08 -0500
More on Lampedusa: How did his signals coompare to I8UDB? He has a similar fantastic QTH, on a mountain top with the medetarenian all around him. He runs "normal" power. He would be a good standard o
/archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00197.html (12,560 bytes)

85. TopBand: "Local" Yackers (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 13:44:35 -0500
It's not only 1850 that is private. Few times during the CQ WW Phone, while operating CG1ZZ (I made sure I do not step on 1850iers tows, who needs the carrier on freq. during the contest, from the op
/archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00205.html (8,342 bytes)

86. Re: Topband: 160 and other Contest Log verification (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:15:31 EST
exchange RST/RS (which is 99% insignificant, superflous, and also false, i.e. automated 599/59) were changed to a serial number or significant number which would require synchronization to validate a
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00330.html (8,200 bytes)

87. Topband: Top Band records updated (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:21:09 EST
Howdy TopBanders! Finally I got all the Top Band contest records updated. You can check them out at http://members.aol.com/k3bu/160Records.htm I am slowly reorganizing my web pages and clearing some
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00331.html (6,474 bytes)

88. Re: Topband: 160 m Propagation (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:02:54 EST
the sunrise end; that happens when a disturbance reaches the level of the duct, upsetting the orderly condition of ionospheric surfaces established in the dark of night. Such disturbances may be of a
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00030.html (7,546 bytes)

89. Re: Topband: 160 FROM GUANTANAMO BAY CUBA (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:18:38 EST
Setup was same as I have here in VA...which does well....came home with same materail on Tuesday....reinstalled them on Wednesday... Everything fine!....<< You should have brought some VA soil :-) Lo
/archives//html/Topband/2006-02/msg00046.html (7,494 bytes)

90. Topband: WPX and all time Top Band records updated (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:55:22 EST
Howdy TopBanders, Top band records updated, icluding "missing" Italian WPX SSB world record. http://members.aol.com/k3bu/160Records.htm Thanks for the QSOs and points during recent CQ WW 160 and ARRL
/archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00073.html (6,779 bytes)

91. Topband: TopBand Beacons (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:57:38 EST
Reading all this commotion about "RX beacon" makes me wonder. Why don't we go for proven, tested and working well NCDXA/IARU beacon system used on high bands? It takes very little space, multiple bea
/archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00077.html (8,058 bytes)

92. Re: Topband: TopBand Beacons (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:24:34 EST
ON4UN<< Solution 1. Use countries that allow or will issue special license for the beacons. Solution 2. Use 1810 kHz, narrow CW signal should not be impediment, much less than ARRL bulletins. (or the
/archives//html/Topband/2006-03/msg00083.html (7,392 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu