Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:7s7v@adamomail.se: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: Inverted L (score: 1)
Author: "Samir Popaja, 7S7V \(SM7VZX\)" <7s7v@adamomail.se>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 21:15:23 +0100
--Original Message-- John, 4 radials isn't anywhere near enough (unless they're elevated). SWR doesn't tell you anything about antenna efficiency. Ideally, you want to keep adding radials until your
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00049.html (9,059 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] CG-3000 vs MFJ-974HB on 160, 80, 40m band (score: 1)
Author: "Samir Popaja, 7S7V \(SM7VZX\)" <7s7v@adamomail.se>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:35:12 +0100
CG-3000; http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/cg_3000.htm MFJ-974HB; http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-974HB Hello, I need to solve my problem on low bands; 160, 80 and 40m wi
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00077.html (7,622 bytes)

3. Topband: CG-3000 vs MFJ-974HB on low bands (summary) (score: 1)
Author: "Samir Popaja" <7s7v@adamomail.se>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:59:40 +0100
Hi, Thanks for all the responses absolutely nice. I put all answers on my web if you are interestd in subject, and I would just say thanks for all the information. http://www.qsl.net/7s7v/mfj_cg-3000
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00101.html (6,652 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu