- 1. [Yaesu] FT1000MP Rx Jack Isolation (score: 1)
- Author: jcowens1@comcast.net
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:04:11 +0000 (UTC)
- I am wanting to transmit high power to an Inverted L on 160M on the A Connector while receiving on a separate anternna connecterd to the Rx jack on the same band. Would like to speak with anyone doin
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2010-01/msg00011.html (6,846 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000MP Rx Jack Isolation (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Lappin W0UY <lappint@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:58:01 -0600
- John, I have used a similar set up with a MarkV MP radio and FT-1000D. My transmitting antenna was an Inverted L and the receiving antennas were 480 foot Beverages. My transmitting antenna was about
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2010-01/msg00012.html (8,511 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000MP Rx Jack Isolation (score: 1)
- Author: "G4GED Dave" <radiodave.g4ged@tiscali.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:59:21 -0800
- John, This question has arisen before on this or some other Reflector. I thought the consensus of opinion was that the RX Only port was either disconnected or earthed during Transmit. It would be nic
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2010-01/msg00013.html (7,603 bytes)
- 4. [Yaesu] FT1000MP Rx Jack Isolation (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Maley" <dgmaley@commspeed.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:06:41 -0600 (CST)
- I can offer a little help. The FT1000D second receiver front-end module has a small rf sens relay built in but the trip point is set way too high to do any good. I modified the circuit so that it wou
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2010-01/msg00015.html (17,345 bytes)
- 5. [Yaesu] FT1000MP Rx Jack Isolation (score: 1)
- Author: jcowens1@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:54:42 +0000 (UTC)
- My thanks to the many people who responded to my request for info in Rx Jack Isolation on the FT1000MP. I put this same queston out on another ham radio reflector and received many responses. They we
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2010-01/msg00016.html (7,446 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu