Mail Archive Search: <+from:kdutson@sbcglobal.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:kdutson@sbcglobal.net: 37 ]

Total 37 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] Test (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:07:22 -0600; Test _______________________________________________ Yaesu mailing list Yaesu@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/yaesu; /archives//html/Yaesu/2005-11/msg00000.html (5,588 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] SO2R Question (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:20:36 -0600; Hi, am new to the list. Have seen only one message so far. Has anyone used the FTdx9000D for SO2R? I want to plan for ARRL SSB Sweepstakes. Thanks for any suggestions. 73, Keith NM5G ________________; /archives//html/Yaesu/2005-11/msg00003.html (6,314 bytes)
3. Re: [Yaesu] what radio ? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:20:57 -0600; The pro3 has a lot of eye candy, but I would choose the mark5 and add an inrad 4KHz roofing filter. 73 Keith NM5G Hi All Is there anyone that own or compared side by side a 1000MP MKV and a 756proIII; /archives//html/Yaesu/2005-11/msg00032.html (7,524 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] GPS Recommendation (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:30:29 -0600; Anyone here hooked a GPS to the 9000D? If so, what is the brand-model and how does it perform? Thanks. 73, Keith NM5G _______________________________________________ Yaesu mailing list Yaesu@contesti; /archives//html/Yaesu/2005-12/msg00013.html (6,205 bytes)
5. Re: [Yaesu] FT2000? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:00:22 -0600; More like a scaled up 1000. It is missing a lot of the built-in features of the 9000. Also, the twin RX is about the same as for the 1000 (only one actual receiver). However, the front panel has many; /archives//html/Yaesu/2005-12/msg00017.html (8,336 bytes)
6. Re: [Yaesu] FT2000? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:30:43 -0600; I have seen a used, fully loaded Field (with 6M transverter) in excellent condition (6 months old) that went for under $1500. 73, Keith NM5G The FT-1000mp Field comes close. No 6m though... John W8JJ; /archives//html/Yaesu/2005-12/msg00023.html (8,408 bytes)
7. Re: [Yaesu] ANY good nw Yaesus? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:56:39 -0600; I had a 101E as my first rig. Wish I had kept it. It was a solid performer. I now have Icom 775DSP, Ten-Tec Orion, Yaesu 9000D and Kenwood 480HX. The Orion is my choice for CW ops. The Yaesu is a toy; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-01/msg00041.html (8,246 bytes)
8. Re: [Yaesu] VFO Lock-Up (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:35:09 -0500; I would guess the rubber on the knob next to the chassis has expanded. Try removing the knob to see if the shaft is free. 73, Keith NM5G I have one of the older Yaesu FT-757 GXII rigs that I have rar; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-05/msg00001.html (7,398 bytes)
9. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:02:27 -0500; I have found all of the Yaesu HF rigs to be excellent. The one you choose is a matter of personal taste. My first was the 101E purchased back in 1977. It gave me many years of enjoyment. About 10 yea; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00008.html (9,536 bytes)
10. Re: [Yaesu] FT2000 later... FT1000 BACK!? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 11:27:58 -0500; I visited your site and downloaded the manual. It saved as a text file and appears to be encrypted. 73, Keith NM5G Hello Yaesu Fans: It appears that the replacement for the Mark V received FCC type a; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00011.html (10,124 bytes)
11. Re: [Yaesu] FT2000 later... FT1000 BACK!? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:41:15 -0500; I think the comparison of the 2000 to the 1000 with mods is an oversimplification. I understand the 2000 is basically a 9000 Contest without some of the frills and in a smaller, lighter weight chassi; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00013.html (9,328 bytes)
12. Re: [Yaesu] FT2000 later... FT1000 BACK!? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:42:32 -0500; Thanks. Instead put a pdf extension on it, then it works. 73 Jim SM2EKM -- _______________________________________________ Yaesu mailing list Yaesu@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00014.html (10,510 bytes)
13. Re: [Yaesu] Will control box for G1000DXA work with G800SA? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:51:56 -0500; I had a G800SDX get knocked out by lightning. I purchased a G1000DXA to replace it. I installed the new rotor and used the old control box until I could figure out how to wire up the new box. All wor; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00022.html (7,605 bytes)
14. Re: [Yaesu] FW: roofing filters (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:41:42 -0500; AFAIK, the original Icom 7800 had 15KHz and 6KHz selectable roofing filters. The 9000 has 15, 6 and 3. According to the 2000 manual I saw, it also has 15, 6 and 3. I understand there is now a free up; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00044.html (10,820 bytes)
15. Re: [Yaesu] FW: roofing filters (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:43:30 -0500; I believe the new term was first used when the filter in front of the IF string became selectable. The filters you are speaking of are IN the IF string. To my knowledge, in the past most good receive; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00046.html (8,965 bytes)
16. Re: [Yaesu] FW: roofing filters (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:58:03 -0500; It is actually a part of the first mixer. Keith So there is a switchable filter that works at the actual received frequency, before frequency conversion to an IF? Now I am really confused! 73, Paul K; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00048.html (8,802 bytes)
17. Re: [Yaesu] Progress and internal tuners (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:33:20 -0500; Actually I think it is more like profit was headed in the gutter and something had to be done to turn this around. Plus, few are willing to pay for a tuner that does more than advertised. 73, Keith N; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-09/msg00013.html (9,085 bytes)
18. Re: [Yaesu] FT-2000 and CW - QSK Question (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 21:12:12 -0600; What review? 73, Keith NM5G I read in a review that when using the FT-2000 in full QSK you cannot hear (receive) between your transmitted dits and dahs. Is that really correct? Marsh, KA5M __________; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-11/msg00023.html (7,069 bytes)
19. Re: [Yaesu] Chip Margelli. (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 13:05:09 -0500; Yes Chip went to Heil. Don't know who replaced him. 73, Keith NM5G Did I read a while back that Chip Margelli had left Yaesu and went to Heil Sound? Was his replacement at Yaesu Dennis Motschenbacher; /archives//html/Yaesu/2007-05/msg00002.html (7,119 bytes)
20. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000 (D) or FT2000? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:50:03 -0600; I find plenty of negative stuff on eHam.net. I consider it to be non-useful (mostly just complaining) for the most part. Actually, the FT2000 blows away the FT1000. It does this primarily by employin; /archives//html/Yaesu/2007-11/msg00030.html (12,286 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]