- 1. [Yaesu] MP problems (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 19:47:23 -0500
- Hi Folks, I'm new around here so go easy if I get outside the lines a bit. I acquired an early FT-1000MP recently and it has a weird problem with the DSP section. It appears that RF is getting into t
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00001.html (7,419 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:32:21 -0500
- I agree... I have the D and an MP. Unless there have been quantum leaps in performance improvements made in the Mark V version I don't find it to be any better. Got lots more gadgetry to play with bu
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00007.html (8,744 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:15:42 -0500
- I sold a Pro II as well. I ran it for a couple of weeks through a receiver multicoupler sharing the same antenna and the Pro II had a slight edge on the FT-1000D in the receive department....but the
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00016.html (10,503 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Yaesu] Yaesu Digest, Vol 42, Issue 5 (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:20:44 -0500
- Agreed on all points.....my only complaint about the D is the tuning rate is too fast and I have a modification kit for both VFO's on the way to correct that. One nice feature of the MP and Mark V is
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00017.html (29,625 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D Last Production (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 20:53:26 -0500
- Probably not.... Cecil WB5VCE FT-1000D FT-1000MP -- Original Message -- From: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com> To: <yaesu@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:39 PM Subject: [Yaesu] F
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00053.html (7,760 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D Last Production (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 08:45:45 -0500
- Well since we have not been able to buy an FT-1000D, for several years from any source, I think it's a good bet they have actually ceased production. Unless of course the military has started buying
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00057.html (10,047 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D Filter Location (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 08:54:28 -0500
- I have not experienced your problem...but the filters are located on the bottom side of the radio. That is assuming you are talking about the 500hz filter for the main receiver. The sub receiver filt
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00058.html (9,034 bytes)
- 8. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000D Filter Location (UNCLASSIFIED) (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:56:02 -0500
- I believe it's plug in because it is an option filter in the FT-1000 not a D.... Cecil.... -- Original Message -- From: <marcelo@alternex.com.br> To: <yaesu@contesting.com> Cc: "Karty, Steven L CIV N
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-06/msg00061.html (11,062 bytes)
- 9. Re: [Yaesu] FT2000 later... FT1000 BACK!? (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:25:36 -0500
- Think I'll stick a roofing filter in my 1000 series and sit back and watch for a while... Cecil WB5VCE -- Original Message -- From: "David Novoa, W4DN" <dnovoa@bellsouth.net> To: <yaesu@contesting.co
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00024.html (8,942 bytes)
- 10. Re: [Yaesu] Roofing filter (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:02:32 -0500
- No Flames here.... Probably in day to day use it would not be noticed and only now and again in competitive use on extremely crowded bands....like 20 mtrs. I don't consider it an obsession as much as
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00029.html (11,603 bytes)
- 11. Re: [Yaesu] Roofing filter (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:25:34 -0500
- I agree with all Mike has said..... Cecil... -- Original Message -- From: "Mike Schatzberg" <cherokeehillfarm@earthlink.net> To: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>; <yaesu@contesting.com>; "Peter S
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00037.html (17,304 bytes)
- 12. Re: [Yaesu] roofing filters (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:44:19 -0500
- I recently sold an Icom 756 Pro II with the all DSP based IF/Detector system.....much like the new 7800. It didn't have the roofing filter in it. There is no denying the benefits of the roofing filte
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00038.html (9,751 bytes)
- 13. Re: [Yaesu] FW: roofing filters (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:15:32 -0500
- It is my understanding that the Pro III implemented a fixed 15Khz roofing filter like that used in the 7800 but the earlier Pro II (which I had) did not. All the reading I have done on the subject in
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00042.html (7,961 bytes)
- 14. Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000d / Ft-1000MP MkV Ant. Tuner (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:13:31 -0500
- It takes the antenna tuner out of the signal path..... You have to start with an antenna that is within the limits of what the tuner will tune. If you get the SWR indication the tuner can't reach res
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00059.html (8,061 bytes)
- 15. Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000D fan noise (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:28:24 -0500
- Yea and get display problems, turn on problems and all the other free options discussed here recently.... Nah...just keep the 1000D with the fan noise.... I operate with a good set of headphones so i
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00067.html (9,505 bytes)
- 16. Re: [Yaesu] FT 1000D Fan Noise (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:00:19 -0500
- I can't say mine is noisy...I know it is cycling on and off but it's not something that is distracting...it's very quiet. I had a brand new Icom 756 Pro II a while back with the Icom power supply and
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00075.html (9,064 bytes)
- 17. Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000D fan noise (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:38:21 -0500
- There are many rigs to start new hams off with that don't cost $2500.....Like the FT-102 for example....probably can be bought all day long for under $500. Having to own a top line rig should not be
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00078.html (11,582 bytes)
- 18. Re: [Yaesu] Yaesu Digest, Vol 43, Issue 18 (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:43:06 -0500
- You might could verify this by turning the RF output to zero and the next time see if cycling the TX restores the RX. Hi John, It maight be ony of the two following issues: First, something is wrong
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00081.html (9,737 bytes)
- 19. Re: [Yaesu] FT-1000D Fan Improvement (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:53:00 -0500
- Good info... I also noticed something that may need to be considered as well. The service manual exploded diagram for the fan shows it to be shock mounted in foam strips. I assume to keep the transmi
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-07/msg00084.html (8,256 bytes)
- 20. Re: [Yaesu] FT1000mp scanning VFO @ startup (heating up problem) (score: 1)
- Author: "Cecil Acuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:24:31 -0500
- Without looking at the schematic I don't know where to expect the problem would be except in the frequency selecting elements of the circuitry. Personally I would let the radio stabilize with the cov
- /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-09/msg00001.html (9,796 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu