Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+red\s+x\s+next\s+to\s+serial\s+number\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+red\s+x\s+next\s+to\s+serial\s+number\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] red x next to serial number (score: 1): Author: k6rb@baymoon.com (K6RB); Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:48:28 -0800; Just finished the RAC Winter contest and noticed that my number 8 QSO had a little red "x" next to the serial number and was not being counted. What's up? I manually inserted that QSO in the Cabrillo; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-12/msg00546.html (6,775 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] red x next to serial number (score: 1): Author: gbaron@charter.net (gbaron); Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 17:23:02 -0600; The X is a manual mark that the QSO is not valid. You must have had it selected in the log and accidentally typed an X. You could have fixed it by selecting the QSO or QSOEs and typing a space. This; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-12/msg00547.html (7,911 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] red x next to serial number (score: 1): Author: n8ie@woh.rr.com (Emmerson Bigguns); Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 18:34:09 -0500; Rob, Make note of the frequency and mode of the contact, chances are the program sees it as an invalid QSO. I ran into this with the ARRL 10M contest, some of the band markers were off and the QSO wa; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-12/msg00548.html (8,277 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]