Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+interface\s+with\s+RITTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+interface\s+with\s+RITTY\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] interface with RITTY (score: 1): Author: gbright@bellsouth.net (Grant Bright, Ph.D.); Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 19:55:52 -0400; And does RITTY ever work state of the art!!! I just got the latest version, 4.53, and it is still better on weak signals...I know free is good, but if you want to copy weak signals, RITTY is the has; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-08/msg00092.html (8,284 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] interface with RITTY (score: 1): Author: dfister@siol.net (David); Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:56:20 +0200; I am listening weak ES7AAZ using WL on 14085 and comparing RITTY vs. MMTTY vs. PK232mbx right now and RITTY is much better on weak signal with qsb than MMTTY.Soundcard is AWE64.And yes, RITTY now wor; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-08/msg00169.html (9,267 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] interface with RITTY (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:24:36 -0500; than I have several comments - please take constructively: 1. If someone posts MMTTY comparisons, comments like "much better" don't help at all without further specifics. For example, which MMTY dem; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-08/msg00172.html (7,270 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] interface with RITTY (score: 1): Author: obrienaj@netsync.net (Andrew J. O'Brien); Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:39:18 -0400; These comments would also be welcome on the digital radio reflector at digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Andy KB2EOQ; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-08/msg00173.html (6,825 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]