Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+how\s+do\s+you\s+handle\s+scoring\s+when\s+you\s+work\s+a\s+dupe\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+how\s+do\s+you\s+handle\s+scoring\s+when\s+you\s+work\s+a\s+dupe\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] how do you handle scoring when you work a dupe? (score: 1): Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick); Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 19:10:07 -0500; I agree that it's simpler to work a dupe than to discuss when and where. But how do you handle the scoring problem it creates. Say you log w1xx at the beginning of a contest. That's what you printed; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-08/msg00097.html (7,739 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] how do you handle scoring when you work a dupe? (score: 1): Author: martyt@pobox.com (Marty Tippin); Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 20:14:48 -0500; You shouldn't need to worry about it -- let the logging program deal with the dupes. It doesn't create a scoring problem, it creates a log checking "problem" -- but even that's not much of a problem.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-08/msg00098.html (8,520 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] how do you handle scoring when you work a dupe? (score: 1): Author: nz3o@arrl.net (ARS NZ3O (Byron) FM29fx); Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 20:30:18 -0400; It just doesn't matter. I just send it in as-is. 73, Byron; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-08/msg00130.html (7,712 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]