Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+a\s+more\s+realistic\s+contest\s+Duty\s+Cycle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+a\s+more\s+realistic\s+contest\s+Duty\s+Cycle\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] a more realistic contest Duty Cycle (score: 1): Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:44:08 -0500; I made up a couple buffers in MMTTY that would be representative of actual contest exchanges. I tried them into a dummy load attempting to simulate normal time sequences. I think my listening segment; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00168.html (8,198 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] a more realistic contest Duty Cycle (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:13:23 -0700; _________________________________________________________ One difference which will affect the duty cycle is I send my call twice instead of once, so basically I would agree with your estimate. Bill,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00171.html (7,213 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] a more realistic contest Duty Cycle (score: 1): Author: k0bx@qsl.net (joseph duerbusch); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 07:50:03 -0700; Is this wishful thinking??? Joe K0BX (who did work the P5 on rtty but not in a contest) <020911 13:27:17 TX> P5/4L4FN TU 599-001 P5/4L4FN BK <020911 13:27:25 RX> 8 seconds; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00172.html (7,065 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] a more realistic contest Duty Cycle (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:31:13 -0500; Now Bill, is that FSK or AFSK? :-)) Theory aside, I would venture that the times wouldn't be identical due to different means of implementation by WL. with; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00176.html (9,468 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]