Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Writelog\s+with\s+HAL\s+ST8000\s+\-\s+Is\s+that\s+the\s+Ultimate\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Writelog with HAL ST8000 - Is that the Ultimate? (score: 1)
Author: herbr@netcom.com (Herb Rosenberg)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 20:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Does anyone know if Writelog will work with the HAL ST8000? I am interested in hearing from anyone that might have experience with this unit, and what kind of results you have seen. Is this the "ulti
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-02/msg00128.html (7,904 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] Writelog with HAL ST8000 - Is that the Ultimate? (score: 1)
Author: raj@logicresources.com (Raj VE6RAJ)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 22:35:45 -0700
I don't know about the ST8000. This weekend my second radio never showed up, so I wired the sound board in parallel with the KAM+ and operated the whole weekend watching both receive windows. There w
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-02/msg00130.html (9,157 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] Writelog with HAL ST8000 - Is that the Ultimate? (score: 1)
Author: dhill@cprk.com (Hill, Don)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:59:22 -0600
I didn't know this before talking with Ron, K5DJ, last week. I had said earlier that the PK232 copied better on 'echo-ey' signals over the pole. He asked me if I use the wide band tuning of WinRTTY.
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-02/msg00146.html (8,915 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] Writelog with HAL ST8000 - Is that the Ultimate? (score: 1)
Author: raj@logicresources.com (Raj)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:35:38 -0700
I did have the wideband decode on. I didn't pay as much attention to it if I had just been using winrtty alone. One thing that I did notice though is that there seems to be a bit of a delay on the st
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-02/msg00151.html (8,571 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] Writelog with HAL ST8000 - Is that the Ultimate? (score: 1)
Author: faunt@netcom.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 23:27:03 -0800 (PST)
Well, I'm not using Writelog yet, but I had a KAM+ and a PTC-IIe running in parallel for recieve during WPX, and saw no substantial difference between them. I was actually disappointed, because some
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-02/msg00163.html (7,383 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu