Hello Everyone, Sometime ago Wayne posted a msg saying WriteLog would have a policy change for registration codes come Jan 1st 2001. Time is almost here and I figured I better make a posting since so
Perhaps better teminology would be "annual maintenance fee". Alan N5NA have here the............ -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administrative requests: writelo
Ron (and Wayne): This policy makes a lot of sense to me and I'd appreciate the necessary information to purchase my next year of upgrades. 73, Mike WA0SXV have here registration you our upgrade this
Ron and Wayne, Good plan; excellent description and reasoning! I appreciate the continued communication and commtment you both have shown to us as users... and sometimes impatient non-readers. :-) Le
Hi Ron, As a very involved and active user of Writelog, I think this is a well thought out plan and will certainly get our ( KV1W M/M team's ) support. $30 per year for the kind of product and suppor
Hi Ron, I was in the lower five percent of my math class. However, I can count fingers and toes. I use WL in about ten contests during the year. Hummmmm! That is about three bucks per contest. I am v
Hi Ron I have been using WL since last August and have found it to be the best contest logging software I have ever used by far. In fact, almost every time I use it I find some new feature that makes
<html> At 05:05 AM 12/10/00 +0000, Ric Plummer wrote:<br> <blockquote type=cite cite>$30 per year for the kind of product and support that we have had for the<br> several years we have been using it
The idea of charging a yearly fee for "Feature enhanced" upgrades is not new in the software industry. It happens frequently and allows enhancements to be released without delay. If you make any enha
I fully support the ideas presented for ongoing support of Writelog. There has to be an equitable manner for compensation for the hours (days, weeks, months etc) poured into supporting such a fine pi
Author: wosborne@utdallas.edu (William P. Osborne)
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 09:53:13 -0600
The annual fee is actually in the users best interest, as it will provide the resources to keep the program upto date. I say make the bug fixes part of the normal releases under the fee for upgrades
Tony, I purchased WL for a specific need (single op contesting w/DVK) no rig control, no networking, no spotting. As I upgrade my station and take advantage of more features, I would like to think th
The upgrade policy seems eminently fair, the product is terrific, and the support excellent. The reflector is a "must check" every day. Please keep me on board! Having heard such good things about WL