Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+WL\s+with\s+KAM\s+XL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+WL\s+with\s+KAM\s+XL\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: wa4tk@comcast.net (Dean Gramling); Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 01:49:52 +0000; I have a KAM XL, it is the latest Multimode TNC from Kantronics. The KAM XL is picky about what Serial ports it works on. Most Motherboard UART's are ok (Com1 and Com2) The Belkin USB to Serial adapt; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00153.html (8,765 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:24:32 -0500; but... Dean: I use an older KAM Plus unit. I find that if the KAM is properly integrated in the software, I get much better results than using a sound card. Why? I can only speculate but here is my o; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00155.html (8,438 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: garry@ni6t.com (Garry Shapiro); Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:47:43 -0000; Ford: The relative performance of hardware vs. software modems has little to do wtih the sound card, unless it is being overdriven and is distorting or it has a very poor A to D converter (ADC). The; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00156.html (11,901 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: jbrannig@optonline.net (Jim Brannigan); Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 06:25:36 -0400; What kind of RTTY MODS are there for the PK-232 and where might I find them? KAM, select AFSK I don't know about the KAM, but the PK-232 provides a discrete output for FSK. When used with a TT OMNI-; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00158.html (8,320 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:29:48 -0500; ...snip... other Garry, to compare the KAM Plus to a PK232 is like comparing a Lexus to a Hundai. The Kam uses a pair of MF10 filters to process the signals. I can, in software, control the bandwidth; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00161.html (9,713 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: jeflanders@comcast.net (Jerry Flanders); Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:44:18 +0000; Garry, you are presuming that all radios generate AFSK internally. Perhaps your radio does it that way. One of mine (FT-1000D) does, but another I have (IC-756PRO) does not. All the KAM can do is fur; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00163.html (8,983 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 13:27:54 -0400; Yes, this is absolutely true. What he is referring to is the fact that SOME radios, although they have an auxiliary jack marked "FSK", this jack is really connected to an *INTERNAL* AFSK generator; i; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00169.html (8,614 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: garry@ni6t.com (Garry Shapiro); Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 06:22:05 -0000; I wrote an article for the now-defunct "Communications Quarterly" in 1993, and then did some additional work. The mods scale down the bandwidth of the front end bandpass filter by almost a factor of; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00185.html (9,996 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: jbrannig@optonline.net (Jim Brannigan); Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:48:39 -0400; I was a casual reader of "Communications Quarterly" A local Tower Records, of all places, carried it and when I was in the area I would pick up a copy. On my last trip I could not find the magazine.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00191.html (11,087 bytes)
10. FW: [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: garry@ni6t.com (Garry Shapiro); Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 18:41:56 -0000; Jim and all: K0BX's mods are totally of a different nature, primarily about interfacing to Kenwood radios. There is also info about putting an ST8000 ahead of a 232 for better filtering. To my knowle; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00195.html (8,710 bytes)
11. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1): Author: garry@ni6t.com (Garry Shapiro); Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:47:05 -0000; Sorry--just one more. I thought I had already sent this response to Carter and the list. Garry Carter: Going through This ain't necessarily so! The devil is in the details, specifically how the two c; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00196.html (8,905 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]