Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+WL\s+in\s+a\s+M\/M\s+Station\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+WL\s+in\s+a\s+M\/M\s+Station\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: Zev.Darack@banklink.com (Darack, Zev); Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:42:23 -0500; You can adjust WL to show most of the band on the bandmap depending on the monitor settings. In the contest I generally used the packet window for finding mults and unworked stations...just clicked o; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-12/msg00039.html (15,991 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: w2cs@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:37:01 -0500; Dear WLers, I'm doing some investigation of various loggers that support a M/M configuration. I've only used WL in a limited way so far, single op in SS, and I'm very impressed. But I've thoroughly p; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00527.html (9,380 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: Zev.Darack@banklink.com (Darack, Zev); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 13:50:00 -0500; see below for response I set up the network at N2NT CQWW SSB M/2 and operated at N2NU CQWW CW M/2. I agree with K3NA that writelog should have the ability to have a fast restart. As a side note, I di; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00533.html (11,699 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br (Marcelo); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:30:11 -0200; Hello Gary We have been using Writelog here in Brazil for some time, on M/M, M/S and M/2 setups, at ZW5B and ZX5J. The software works great in network, and crash recovery is impressive. So, to your q; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00542.html (13,072 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: tony.osman@sympatico.ca (Tony Osman); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 17:36:38 -0500; I believe bandmap entries are sent across the network in 10.36 and higher. Tony, Ve3rz recovery, good. already locations). welcome. SS, few (re)started. QSOs/Mults True? the this. band such; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00543.html (14,620 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: w2cs@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:50:42 -0500; Looks like my original set of questions proved I was confused! :-) I used the term "WL Server" in the same context as the documentation used it. The documentation to which I refer is at www.k9jy.com; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00548.html (12,692 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: writelog@w1qa.com (Bob McCormick W1QA); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 19:12:42 -0500; I'm pretty new to WriteLog ... but will try to provide some answers. 1. WriteLog server Does not exist. There's some good documentation in the help files and/or the PDF file on this. Basically the pr; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00549.html (10,048 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: marcelo@alternex.com.br (Marcelo); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:32:39 -0200; Hi Gary, Yes, that´s basically the idea. So, we pick the computer that has no logging functions and name it "server". When you connect a position to the network, you do a Setup > Link to networ; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00550.html (15,279 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:29:09 -0000; Gary, Perhaps it is not a good idea to use one computer the as "server." If the "server" goes down, then the rest of the network falls apart, as all are connected to it. If each computer links to a d; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00551.html (14,439 bytes)
10. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: kc0czi@midmoskywarn.net (Kevin Brown - KC0CZI); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 19:33:23 -0600; I'm a telco engineer (known to be vague) - but here's my responses... 1. The existence of a WL server. I presume this is a requirement when running M/M? It depends. A: Under a peer to peer arrangemen; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00552.html (12,771 bytes)
11. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: k3pp@ptd.net (Glenn O'Donnell, K3PP); Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:25:32 -0500; Most ethernet networking is not affected by RF, especially the now-common twisted-pair ethernet systems. The signalling on the wires is resistant to RFI by design. Of course, some network switches m; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00553.html (8,364 bytes)
12. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: scot@k9jy.com (Scot Herrick); Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:30:39 -0600; Hi Gary, et. al., A couple of comments on this thread (a good one, by the way): My documentation for networking on the K9JY site is now a year and a half old. Wayne has made some significant improvem; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00562.html (13,448 bytes)
13. [WriteLog] WL in a M/M Station (score: 1): Author: w2cs@bellsouth.net (Gary Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 06:56:43 -0500; Yet another question came to mind as I was reliving the CQ WW CW contest this morning. The question has to do with band maps. We were using TRLog in a 4-position M/M set up. TRLog provides its band m; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-11/msg00586.html (15,512 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]