Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Super\s+Check\s+Partial\s+\&\s+Log\s+Size\s+Questions\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Super Check Partial & Log Size Questions (score: 1)
Author: k2kw@prodigy.net (KEN SILVERMAN)
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:53:06 -0700
1) Is there a limit to the size of the file that can be used for Super Check Partial? I have a fairly large SCP file I've made that barely fits on a floppy, but wanted to know if there were any file
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00043.html (7,481 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] Super Check Partial & Log Size Questions (score: 1)
Author: k5zd@ma.ultranet.com (Randy Thompson, K5ZD)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:18:17 -0000
I have done contests with over 4100 QSOs. You will start to notice some slow down in the ability of the super check partial to fill in the window. I solved most of this by throwing more computer powe
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00048.html (9,116 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] Super Check Partial & Log Size Questions (score: 1)
Author: wt4i@brevard.net (Bruce Lifter)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:32:41 -0400
I converted a file with more than 100,000 calls in to a Writelog Super Check Partial format file. This file is 643KB. The problem with a file this big is that it contains so many calls it may mislea
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00050.html (7,902 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] Super Check Partial & Log Size Questions (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 02:15:49 -0400
It to SCP might be better now. After this year's ARRL DX CW contest, I posted a comment that SCP got pretty slow above the 2000 QSO mark, even on a 600MHz Pentium. Wayne made a speedup improvement to
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00055.html (7,985 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu