- 1. [WriteLog] Super Check Partial & Log Size Questions (score: 1)
- Author: k2kw@prodigy.net (KEN SILVERMAN)
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:53:06 -0700
- 1) Is there a limit to the size of the file that can be used for Super Check Partial? I have a fairly large SCP file I've made that barely fits on a floppy, but wanted to know if there were any file
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00043.html (7,481 bytes)
- 2. [WriteLog] Super Check Partial & Log Size Questions (score: 1)
- Author: k5zd@ma.ultranet.com (Randy Thompson, K5ZD)
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:18:17 -0000
- I have done contests with over 4100 QSOs. You will start to notice some slow down in the ability of the super check partial to fill in the window. I solved most of this by throwing more computer powe
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00048.html (9,116 bytes)
- 3. [WriteLog] Super Check Partial & Log Size Questions (score: 1)
- Author: wt4i@brevard.net (Bruce Lifter)
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:32:41 -0400
- I converted a file with more than 100,000 calls in to a Writelog Super Check Partial format file. This file is 643KB. The problem with a file this big is that it contains so many calls it may mislea
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00050.html (7,902 bytes)
- 4. [WriteLog] Super Check Partial & Log Size Questions (score: 1)
- Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 02:15:49 -0400
- It to SCP might be better now. After this year's ARRL DX CW contest, I posted a comment that SCP got pretty slow above the 2000 QSO mark, even on a 600MHz Pentium. Wayne made a speedup improvement to
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00055.html (7,985 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu