Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Slow\s+CW\s+decoding\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Slow\s+CW\s+decoding\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Slow CW decoding (score: 1): Author: Chad.Kurszewski@motorola.com (Kurszewski Chad-WCK005); Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:03:09 -0600; In setting up for a M/S this weekend, I dragged my old computer out of the construction dust and have been working on getting it set up and networked to my main computer. I have almost everything goi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00285.html (7,710 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Slow CW decoding (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:01:02 -0500; Chad, My second computer is an old P-60, upgraded with an Overdrive chip and slightly overclocked to 133 MHz. The CW works fine, along with bandmap, packet, etc. I am using the multi-CW decode. Have; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00288.html (8,757 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Slow CW decoding (score: 1): Author: Chad.Kurszewski@motorola.com (Kurszewski Chad-WCK005); Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:00:13 -0600; No, not exactly. Too slow for what I was asking of it. It was overcome by narrowing up the WPM window. I had it set to 22 WPM to 50 WPM. By narrowing it to 28-45 WPM, everything is working great. But; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00345.html (8,313 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] Slow CW decoding (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 18:14:52 -0500; I had a P133 and it didn't work very well for decoding CW. Thought I read somewhere that 300 MHz was about the minimum for full CW decoding. Wayne or Ron may have the official word 73/Carter/K8VT --; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00351.html (8,523 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]