Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Serial\s+number\s+again\s+\-\s+NOT\s+IN\s+CABRILLO\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Serial number again - NOT IN CABRILLO (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun Jan 26 17:47:07 2003
I've never heard of anyone being penalized for duplicate (or missing) serial numbers - has anyone? I'm sure the spirit of the PROGRESSIVE serial number rule is to ban starting in the middle of a con
/archives//html/WriteLog/2003-01/msg00494.html (7,805 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] Serial number again - NOT IN CABRILLO (score: 1)
Author: jeflanders@comcast.net (Jerry Flanders)
Date: Sun Jan 26 18:32:28 2003
But if the rules clearly state that I should give out consecutive serial numbers, and I violate this by giving two guys the same one, you would think I have committed a "bad", right? Why in the world
/archives//html/WriteLog/2003-01/msg00496.html (8,434 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] Serial number again - NOT IN CABRILLO (score: 1)
Author: kk9a@arrl.net (kk9a@arrl.net)
Date: Sun Jan 26 21:19:38 2003
Both sent and recieved serial numbers ARE included in the WPX cabrillo files. 73, John <snip> And guess what? THE SERIAL NUMBER DOESN'T EVEN GET PORTED OVER INTO CABRILLO FILES! ;-) _________________
/archives//html/WriteLog/2003-01/msg00503.html (7,833 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] Serial number again - NOT IN CABRILLO (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Sun Jan 26 22:57:22 2003
Of course they are. Instead of an excuse for that post, I promise not to post for at least a week! I still maintain it doesn't matter as long as both the sender and receiver log the same number, it
/archives//html/WriteLog/2003-01/msg00504.html (7,460 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu