- 1. [WriteLog] Rotor Control Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: Rick Tavan <rick@tavan.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:01:11 -0700
- Rotor control seems to have improved a bit while I wasn't looking. The Setup | Ports dialog now admits that the Left rig might be the only rig and if you have two radios there are conditions under wh
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2008-06/msg00018.html (7,719 bytes)
- 2. Re: [WriteLog] Rotor Control Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: Gedking@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:03:23 EDT
- WriteLog@contesting.com Me believes auto rotor controls are a waste of time for contesting and a lot of wear and tear on a rotor. Ain't telling you what to do BUT from Michigan for dx contests I poin
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2008-06/msg00020.html (7,809 bytes)
- 3. Re: [WriteLog] Rotor Control Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: Bryan Swadener <bswadener@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
- I'm with Ed on this -- 99.9% of us likely don't have arrays with a beamwidth so narrow that we need high precision in aiming our antennas. A typical 3 element yagi has something like a 60° (@ -3dB)
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2008-06/msg00023.html (8,595 bytes)
- 4. Re: [WriteLog] Rotor Control Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: "Alfred Frugoli" <ke1fo@arrl.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:46:03 -0400
- If WriteLog is to support SO2R operations well, I think this upgrade needs to happen. I have a very small station, but by the upcoming contest season, I'll have two rotateable yagis. Small, low - yes
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2008-06/msg00025.html (10,016 bytes)
- 5. Re: [WriteLog] Rotor Control Suggestion (score: 1)
- Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:12:44 -0500
- Since Wayne added it at my suggestion a couple of years ago, for those using spots for assistance, you can sort spots by Azimuth, accomplising two things: a. reduce rotator wear and tear b. no longer
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2008-06/msg00027.html (7,605 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu