Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Re\:\s+WriteLog\s+digest\,\s+Vol\s+1\s+\#466\s+\-\s+8\s+msgs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Re\:\s+WriteLog\s+digest\,\s+Vol\s+1\s+\#466\s+\-\s+8\s+msgs\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Re: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #466 - 8 msgs (score: 1): Author: mravitz@ix.netcom.com (Mitch Ravitz); Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 22:56:10 -0400; This is a case of one entity creating their own "standard" and then the world deciding it is good enough. Similar to the ARRL not allowing eQSL to modify it's system to meet their needs but instead d; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00134.html (48,719 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Re: WriteLog digest, Vol 1 #466 - 8 msgs (score: 1): Author: jbastin@sssnet.com (John E Bastin, K8AJS); Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 08:48:29 -0400; And I like the idea of people who, when replying to a digest message, take the trouble to change the message subject to mean something, and also to _not_ quote the entire digest in their reply. 73, -; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-05/msg00135.html (7,296 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]