Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Re\:\s+SCC\s+RTTY\s+rules\s+propossal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Re\:\s+SCC\s+RTTY\s+rules\s+propossal\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Re: SCC RTTY rules propossal (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:32:05 -0600; The rules look good to me except the band change limits. I'm curious why all the interest in limiting band changes for single ops? This doesn't seem like a good idea. Instead of discouraging SO2R wit; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-02/msg00312.html (9,822 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Re: SCC RTTY rules propossal (score: 1): Author: wt4i@brevard.net (Bruce Lifter, WT4I); Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 02:46:40 -0500; I am with Don on this one... The RTTY contests outside the big 3 can already be painfully slow. To further limit the rate by imposing a 10 band change rule is crazy. Given the band change rule, I wil; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-02/msg00313.html (8,456 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Re: SCC RTTY rules propossal (score: 1): Author: Roger Borowski" <K9RB@arrl.net (Roger Borowski); Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:23:09 -0500; The best way to eliminate participation in any contest is to make the rules too dificult to follow. 73, -=Rog-K9RB=- -- Original Message -- From: Bruce Lifter, WT4I <wt4i@brevard.net> To: Don Hill AA; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-02/msg00314.html (9,623 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]