Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RTTY\s+M\/M\s+and\s+Cabrillo\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RTTY\s+M\/M\s+and\s+Cabrillo\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] RTTY M/M and Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: "Hal Kennedy" <halken@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:14:40 -0400; Noticed the CQWW RTTY rules require you indicate which transmitter made the contact even in M/M category, and WL produced Cabrillo logs only show it for M/S and M/2. The Cabrillo log is missing the t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-10/msg00066.html (6,692 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY M/M and Cabrillo (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:50:36 -0400; I don't get it. In M/S and M/2, the "which transmitter" flag makes sure you don't violate the 10-minute rule on either transmitter. There is no 10 minute rule in M/M class (duh). Why would they need; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-10/msg00069.html (7,577 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]