Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+QTC\'s\s+AFTER\s+a\s+contact\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+QTC\'s\s+AFTER\s+a\s+contact\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [WriteLog] QTC's AFTER a contact (score: 1): Author: "Don Cassel" <ve3xd@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:24:12 -0500; Phil, I'm using 10.55D and this doesn't do what you suggest for me unless I misunderstand your procedure. If I enter a call then wipe it, either by using Alt-W or the backspace the QTCs then get assi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00157.html (9,146 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] QTC's AFTER a contact (score: 1): Author: <steve@ai9t.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:36:56 -0500 (EST); I did this 3 or 4 times during the contest. I left them as dupes. Hope the log checkers know what is going on!! Steve AI9T _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteL; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00159.html (10,111 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] QTC's AFTER a contact (score: 1): Author: "Wolf, DL6JZ" <dl6jz@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:04:49 -0000; Hi Phil, I think this is not a good idea!! Why don't you want to have a dupe in your log? There is no reason for that. My opinion is: Better more dupes than less points!! There are no penalties in th; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00162.html (8,814 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] QTC's AFTER a contact (score: 1): Author: Werner Maier <werner@maiers.de>; Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:15:44 +0100; Hi, I think they know. look how writelog saves all those data: You can imagine it like an big excel sheet, each line contains one contact. in WAE there are just more columns than in CQWW, because eac; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00163.html (8,445 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]