Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Problem\s+with\s+Bandmap\s+in\s+WL\s+10\.22B\s+\(and\s+earlier\)\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Problem with Bandmap in WL 10.22B (and earlier) (score: 1)
Author: roycraft@research.att.com (Ted Roycraft)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:10:43 -0500
I recently upgraded to version 10 from version 9 and I noticed that if you do this ... 1) create a bandmap 2) create a second bandmap (using "New View ..." in the File menu of the first bandmap) If y
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00051.html (8,470 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] Problem with Bandmap in WL 10.22B (and earlier) (score: 1)
Author: jfleming@shelbynet.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:58:30 -0500
I observe a difference between setting the center freq via 1) Clicking on the File Menu first, then set center etc (works) 2) Right-clicking on the bandmap to get the menu. If you do it this way, th
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00052.html (9,077 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] Problem with Bandmap in WL 10.22B (and earlier) (score: 1)
Author: roycraft@research.att.com (Ted Roycraft)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:04:11 -0500
John, Ah yes, you're right. Thanks! --Ted, W2ZK -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-writelog
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00053.html (9,852 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] Problem with Bandmap in WL 10.22B (and earlier) (score: 1)
Author: kg6ok@pacbell.net (Herb Rosenberg)
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 19:35:48 +0000
I noticed this too, and asked about it a few weeks ago with no reply. It also tied into the question of opening a separate band map for each band, with the hope that the packet spots would fill up ea
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00054.html (9,345 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] Problem with Bandmap in WL 10.22B (and earlier) (score: 1)
Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU)
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 15:43:31 -0500
Just a comment that I played with multiple bandmaps during CQ WW and packet spots flowed no problem into the additional band maps. I was running 10.19 at that time. GL/73, Barry N1EU www.albany.net/~
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00055.html (8,394 bytes)

6. [WriteLog] Problem with Bandmap in WL 10.22B (and earlier) (score: 1)
Author: jfleming@shelbynet.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:42:59 -0500
I can vouch that the above does work if using DX Telnet linked to Writelog, and I thought I understood that it works with the Writelog telnet feature too. I think the "new" spots will fill the multi
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00056.html (8,806 bytes)

7. [WriteLog] Problem with Bandmap in WL 10.22B (and earlier) (score: 1)
Author: roycraft@research.att.com (Ted Roycraft)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 15:53:31 -0500
I think John, WA9ALS, zeroed in on my problem. If you use the File menu of any Bandmap window, things seem to work ok but if you "right-click" while in the new Bandmap window to bring up the menu, yo
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00057.html (9,694 bytes)

8. [WriteLog] Problem with Bandmap in WL 10.22B (and earlier) (score: 1)
Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU)
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 17:13:06 -0500
DX Telnet is nice, but not necessary for packet spots to flow into multiple band maps with 10.22B. When using Writelog's own Packet Terminal connection, a "sh/dx/100" command will fill the bandmaps f
/archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00058.html (10,057 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu