- 1. [WriteLog] pk-900 (score: 1)
- Author: jimsharp@attbi.com (Jim)
- Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 11:29:12 -0500
- Does anyone know if the PK-900 is supported or can be used by WriteLog? If it is, I might consider getting the DSP upgrade for it. If not, then = I guess I can=20 just use the sound board option in W
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00079.html (6,753 bytes)
- 2. [WriteLog] PK-900 (score: 1)
- Author: jimsharp@attbi.com (Jim)
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:36:10 -0500
- Does any one know if WriteLog supports the PK-900? I've been unable to get it to work using the "PK-232" selection. Any ideas? Jim - W5AP -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alte
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00083.html (6,547 bytes)
- 3. [WriteLog] PK-900 (score: 1)
- Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
- Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 17:43:57 -0500
- I'd like to know this too so I can put the info up on the Web. I think it does but the problem is that you must communicate to the PK-900 at something different than the PK-232? I communicate to my P
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00087.html (7,756 bytes)
- 4. [WriteLog] PK-900 (score: 1)
- Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin)
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:09:44 -0400
- The PK900 works fine at 9600 baud...
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00098.html (6,325 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu