Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Open\s+Letter\s+to\s+Wayne\s+\-\s+Networking\s*$/: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gorecki" <ve3cwj@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 10:55:30 -0400
With the power of Writelog and it's networking, I have a suggestion in improving the networking flexability of WL. We have all seen (and many have posted) issues around the networking of WL, and with
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00207.html (10,781 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:48:32 +0000
sniped Better be careful here. Some of the high ports do not take kindly to even being interrogated, much less written to. You can easily wipe out a disk if you choose the wrong one. ( believe me on
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00211.html (7,705 bytes)

3. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Lyle C. Anderson" <lyle@lcanderson.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:59:18 -0400
I fully support Steve's proposal. We had a six station Writelog installation running on Field Day and found that the NetDDE interface to be totally unreliable. It failed at least 5 times during field
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00214.html (13,157 bytes)

4. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:12:52 -0500
I strongly concur that something serious needs to be done to drastically improve networking. My two laptops networked fine at home, but nothing that I tried at the Field Day site could get them to se
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00215.html (8,045 bytes)

5. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: ad6e@inreach.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
I've never had to set up WL in a network before. A couple years ago we used WL in a 3 machine network for FD and it worked flawlessly. I think the only thing that needed to be done was to set a stati
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00223.html (8,606 bytes)

6. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:20:18 -0000
Hear Hear. Amen. This is one fantastic program whose enjoyability is just hobbled by the constant aggravation of the networking. I was interrupted DOZENS of times at Field Day to run around and recon
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00224.html (8,855 bytes)

7. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Bill O'Mara, W4RM" <W4RM@COMCAST.Net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:35:34 -0400
The W4IY FD team also had problems staying connected on our 9A field day set-up. Two weeks prior to FD we used the same configuration when mountain topping from FM08 in the VHF contests with the same
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00225.html (9,994 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:42:57 -0000
Reading all this about network problems, is completely the opposite of what we had running our 3 Pentium 133's networked, all using 98SE. Never the first hint of a problem. I didn't setup the network
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00226.html (10,141 bytes)

9. Fw: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "K7ZO (Scott Tuthill)" <k7zo@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:07:28 -0600
I am not a networking expert and Steve's ideas are beyond me. But, I have built and maintained a 5 computer Writelog network setup at NK7U that has endured many multi-op contests. During that time we
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00230.html (14,468 bytes)

10. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Robert McGwier" <rwmcgwier@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:04:07 -0000
Let's make sure we are comparing apples to apples. How many of your computers are running Windows XP with all of its security features that make NetDDE such a royal pain in the butt? If you are runni
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00232.html (16,058 bytes)

11. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Ferdinand W2CS" <w2cs@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:20:39 -0400
We ran a multi-multi of 5 positions this past contest year at NY4A. While I will readily admit that configuring it all required no small measure of ATTENTION TO DETAIL, especially when mixing, as we
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00233.html (18,969 bytes)

12. Re: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:23:43 +0000
Well, it's a poor workman who blames his tools. I just wonder how all the other thousands of us manage to do it without trouble. 73 Ed _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00234.html (8,943 bytes)

13. Re: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Robin D. Keller" <rdkeller@nashvillenc.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:28:56 -0400
We used 5 133mhz machines. All had: Disk drives wiped. Vanilla copy of WIN 98. Workgroup name of WL Computer names A, B, C, D and N. Burn in for 2 weeks before FD. One died upon movement. Replaced wi
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00235.html (10,308 bytes)

14. Re: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: Nick Lekic <ve3ey@rac.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:48:11 -0400
This is true, but sooner or later Writelog will face the same problem CT has today. It's reliability will depend on old and obsolete technology. Many choose Writelog over CT for the very same reason
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00236.html (9,270 bytes)

15. Re: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 03:58:41 -0000
technology. It oes now as a result of our abuse of serial and LPT ports. salvager. _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00237.html (10,789 bytes)

16. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Hackler" <rhackler@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:56:09 -0400
At N4N, this was the fourth year we used Writelog in a networked environment. I can attest that it is a bunch better now than a few years ago. What made it really easy for us this year was that we ra
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00242.html (12,880 bytes)

17. Re: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "DH5HV" <dh5hv@dh5hv.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:21:10 +0200
Hello all. We just used also latest version of WL during WPX CW contest. Call was DL8WPX. First we were thinking of using CT, but Ben, DL6FBL did a good job to bring us to WL. He brought some machine
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00243.html (9,763 bytes)

18. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Rob" <rob@christos-consulting.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:58:54 -0400
Incorporation of an IP Address/Port combination could be very good. As far as static addressing, the connectivity could be designed to allow for DHCP. Basically, decide on an appropriate port number
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00244.html (14,608 bytes)

19. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gorecki" <ve3cwj@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:03:28 -0400
I've been reading the replies on the reflector and would like to clarify, agree and disagree with some of them. Windows 98 as "magic answer": (partially agree...) While true, if all of us run W98 or
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00246.html (13,913 bytes)

20. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:53:18 -0400
I too have been sitting back watching this thread. Interesting ... NetDDE and NetBIOS are depreciated things; they're still being supported in one form or another - but if you were to start from scra
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00249.html (13,717 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu