- 1. [WriteLog] Numbers in WPX (score: 1)
- Author: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:09:04 -0700
- Don, I've alwaysused %3 for numbers in a contest. I read that you use %1. What happens when you get into double digits and triple digits? Does WL send, for example, 19 and when you get into 3 numbers
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2016-02/msg00034.html (7,274 bytes)
- 2. Re: [WriteLog] Numbers in WPX (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:39:49 -0600
- Hi Dick. I don't always use %1. For XE RTTY, I used %3. Yes, it starts out 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10... then when it gets to 100 it sends 100 and when it gets to 1000, it sends 1000. Many of the
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2016-02/msg00035.html (7,952 bytes)
- 3. Re: [WriteLog] Numbers in WPX (score: 1)
- Author: Arpad <yt2u@mail.ru>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:19:49 +0000
- Single-digit number may be faster for send/rec but impractical. In QRM when recevies for example 12 not sure of the exact number received ...12....012....125.... I always use 3 digit 001. Arpad, YT2U
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2016-02/msg00037.html (8,848 bytes)
- 4. Re: [WriteLog] Numbers in WPX (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:05:56 -0500
- Hi all, I tend to agree with Arpad on this. I always use 3 digits for the serial number, and prefer to see the same on my screen. Getting 599 1 1 1 is always confusing, whereas 599 123 123 is not. Ho
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2016-02/msg00038.html (7,971 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu