Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Networking\s+and\s+dups\s+in\s+log\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Networking\s+and\s+dups\s+in\s+log\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Networking and dups in log (score: 1): Author: Phil Florig <W9IXX@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:57:00 -0400; Hi all, Returned from the Sable island trip and Writelog worked great. The other two were using CT and were impressed by the Writelog program. This is the situation/problem. The two computers on CT w; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-08/msg00056.html (8,978 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Networking and dups in log (score: 1): Author: "G3SJJ" <g3sjj@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:30:19 +0100; Hi Phil, I think the bottom line is that a contest adjudicator wouldn't penalise you for dupes these days, and particularly if you noted that you had experienced problems. Interesting though because; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-08/msg00060.html (10,893 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Networking and dups in log (score: 1): Author: "Dean St. Hill" <vision2000@acepaging.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:37:32 -0400; Hi Phil, Great job on Sable Island!!! I can only answer one section of the question, which is that if it were a contest, the dupes would be marked in the log, and you would not be penalised. Personal; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-08/msg00061.html (11,835 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] Networking and dups in log (score: 1): Author: kd4d@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 03:19:15 +0000; Hi Dean: CT has a "MERGE" utility which will merge multiple binary files and remove duplicates. I don't remember the exact details, but check their web site. I recently merged 10-15 logs for a Field; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-08/msg00065.html (13,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]