Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Icom\s+Split\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Icom\s+Split\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Icom Split (score: 1): Author: ric@kv1w.com (Ric Plummer); Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:40:35 -0000; Thought I would put my two cents in to the Icom Split discussion. The root cause is that Icom designed an interface that is write only. A real NO-NO in computer architecture. By that I mean, the comp; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00162.html (7,772 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Icom Split (score: 1): Author: w0etc@ix.netcom.com (Larry Lindblom); Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:50:14 +0000; Ric, thanks for putting it in an understandable format. It is what I was trying to say but I wasn't clear enough. 73 -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administrati; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00163.html (8,655 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Icom Split (score: 1): Author: kg0us@swbell.net (kg0us@swbell.net); Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 21:50:20 -0600; Hello Ric, Thanks for the assistance but I tried the IcomForceSplit=1 command in the writelog.ini file without any luck. I still believe that the 775 driver is incorrect for setting the split frequen; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00167.html (9,923 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] Icom Split (score: 1): Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD); Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 05:20:05 -0000; For what its worth, WL treats the Icom 775 exactly the same way as it treats all other Icom rigs. I don't have one in my shack, nor do I have any documentation for it. If you fax the 775 docs to 425); /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00169.html (6,961 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]