Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+and\s+Cabrillo\s+Log\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Field\s+Day\s+and\s+Cabrillo\s+Log\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Field Day and Cabrillo Log (score: 1): Author: johnd@tdkt.org (John Desmond); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:41:37 -0500; I was recently getting my Field Day stuff together and am trying to get Writelog to create a Cabrillo file so I can send it to the ARRL site. It looks like they require a Cabrillo formatted file for; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00240.html (6,864 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Field Day and Cabrillo Log (score: 1): Author: Rick.Commo@verizon.net (Rick Commo); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 19:55:08 -0700; you're not alone - I had the same experience. -ricK7log I was recently getting my Field Day stuff together and am trying to get Writelog to create a Cabrillo file so I can send it to the ARRL site. I; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00241.html (7,594 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Field Day and Cabrillo Log (score: 1): Author: nacham@cox-internet.com (Army Curtis); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:08:25 -0500; Cabrillo logs are NOT required for Field Day. From the ARRL web site: 8. Reporting: 8.1. Entries must be postmarked or emailed by July 23, 2002. No late entries can be accepted. A complete entry cons; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00242.html (9,493 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] Field Day and Cabrillo Log (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C); Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 07:44:49 -0400; ARRL does NOT want a Cabrillo log for Field Day!!! Just a dupe and summary sheet. This was covered on the reflector earlier this month or the end of June - check the archives. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Re; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-07/msg00251.html (7,095 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]