Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Does\s+WL\s+or\s+N1MM\s+have\s+any\s+neat\s+features\s+the\s+otherdoesn\'t\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Does\s+WL\s+or\s+N1MM\s+have\s+any\s+neat\s+features\s+the\s+otherdoesn\'t\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [WriteLog] Does WL or N1MM have any neat features the otherdoesn't? (score: 1): Author: "George Vagner" <george@vagner.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:14:36 -0500; Yes writelog has a new feature called "auto crash no recover" What it does is automatically crash when the network traffic gets too much for it to handle, this saves bandwidth and prevents users from; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-12/msg00082.html (8,812 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Does WL or N1MM have any neat features the otherdoesn't? (score: 1): Author: "DH5HV" <dh5hv@dh5hv.de>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:22:45 +0100; Hello Barry. Writelog is a real stable program but for sure with less great features then N1MM. I have a license for WL but I mostly use N1MM for single op contests. At DF0CG we normally use WL, but; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-12/msg00086.html (10,758 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Does WL or N1MM have any neat features the otherdoesn't? (score: 1): Author: "Branislav Panak" <brano@panak.org>; Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:12:50 +0100; My opinion is that both sw does have aproximatelly same functions. I can say that as Wayne introduced tcp/ip networking the net in wl does not work correctly. The problem is that nobody realy told us; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-12/msg00090.html (9,140 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]