Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Cut\s+Nembers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Cut\s+Nembers\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Cut Nembers (score: 1): Author: wi8w@arrl.net (wi8w); Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:01:18 -0000; I used to send cut numbers. After spending more time doing repeats than I saved by using them, I dropped them like a rock. Imagine being a new contester and running into this. It's a very bad thing.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00125.html (7,403 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Cut Nembers (score: 1): Author: ars@ea4tx.com (Pablo - EA4TX); Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 00:34:32 +0200; Why not to use Cut Numbers? It's more exciting, require quick reflexs, and you spent less time for TX'ing So, resolutely.....YES to cut numbers. If during a contest at just your QRL someone request:; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00140.html (8,075 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Cut Nembers (score: 1): Author: ars@ea4tx.com (Pablo - EA4TX); Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 01:10:08 +0200; Ron, Just as an example... During last WPX Contest I made 1200 QSO's (around 45% USA's stations). I was playing 30-32 WPM most time. I only received < 10-12 times "PSE NR AGN?" I suppose some of thos; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00141.html (10,374 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] Cut Nembers (score: 1): Author: K0HB@qwest.net" <K0HB@qwest.net (Hans K0HB); Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 01:22:26 +0100; I respectfully disagree. I "grew up" making my living with Morse code at sea. We used cut numbers extensively sending WXOBS messages, which were 5-letter groups of numbers. Cut numbers are the only; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00144.html (7,766 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] Cut Nembers (score: 1): Author: w2ge@home.com (Phil Levin W2GE); Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 21:36:40 -0400; Hans, I respectfully disagree.... As you stated you "grew up making your living" copying code.... Many hams did not... including myself, it just throws me off when I get "cut" numbers and often, as t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00146.html (8,938 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] Cut Nembers (score: 1): Author: jbrannig@optonline.net (Jim Brannigan); Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 21:45:07 -0400; My 2 cents It depends......5NN is universal... Full numbers should be sent during Sweepstakes. If your are running a freq. and have a good signal, cut numbers move it along, if condx are marginal, cu; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00147.html (8,090 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] Cut Nembers (score: 1): Author: K0HB@qwest.net" <K0HB@qwest.net (Hans K0HB); Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 03:08:13 +0100; On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:37 AM, Phil Levin W2GE [SMTP:w2ge@home.com] wrote: Good. That gives me a slight competitive edge over you in the next contest. I can live with that. Can you? 73, Hans, K0; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-05/msg00148.html (7,633 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]