Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+CW\s+via\s+audio\s+tones\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+CW\s+via\s+audio\s+tones\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [WriteLog] CW via audio tones (score: 1): Author: "Mark Shaum" <k9tr@dtnspeed.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:50:46 -0600; -- Original Message -- -- Gah! I wish they didn't. I suppose this could explain the number of CW signals heard in this weekend's SS contest that sound like they are transmitting four "tones" at once.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00054.html (6,867 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] CW via audio tones (score: 1): Author: "ROBERT CARROLL" <w2wg@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:27:17 -0500; I was not in the SS but was listening from time to time and heard some of the multi tone signals. If I had not seen this thread I would not have known why they sounded so bizarre. Bob W2WG -- Origina; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00055.html (8,370 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] CW via audio tones (score: 1): Author: "Kevin der Kinderen" <kevin@kj4qf.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:33:47 +0000; Guys and gals. The original question was whether WL had the ability or not. I didn't mean to start anything or drag the discussion off topic. If I did, I appologize. WL doesn't do it and that is fine; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00056.html (6,855 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] CW via audio tones (score: 1): Author: k4sb@bellsouth.net; Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:25:55 +0000; -- Try being twice below the legal definition orf deafness and see how they sound. In this case, garbage in, and ? came out. Like tryihng to hear under water with a high school band marching overhead; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00059.html (7,301 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]