Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+CW\s+Jitters\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: <rgarrett5@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 08:10:40 -0400
Greetings, _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog WriteLog on the web: http://www.writelog
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00000.html (6,007 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 08:57:31 -0500
state which version of Windows you are running, or how fast your CPU is. I believe what you describe is exactly what a WinKeyer is suppose to keep from happening. Hopefully others with more knowledg
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00001.html (7,952 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 13:59:46 +0000
I used WL in NAQP with no issues, so I don't think it is the software. How are you doing the keying? Possible RFI? Randy K5ZD Greetings, I've had an ongoing problem using WriteLog with CW breaking up
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00002.html (7,673 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: Ed W0YK <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 08:30:28 -0700
This is typical behavior when using PC-generated CW.  It is worse with slower CPUs and heavily loaded PCs.  Modern, fast CPUs with only WriteLog running send perfect CW most of the time.Most people u
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00003.html (7,704 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: Jim <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 13:33:22 -0500
A winkeyer, a MORTTY or an IC7610 using USB CW send, which also works perfectly. Thanks 73 Jim W7RY I believe what you describe is exactly what a WinKeyer is suppose to keep from happening. Hopefully
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00005.html (8,798 bytes)

6. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 15:25:52 -0500
Bob, we need more information. What interface are you using for CW keying? I use a simple transistor interface connected to a legacy serial port on one PC and I use a Mortty connected to a USB port o
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00006.html (8,266 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: <rgarrett5@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 18:36:54 -0400
Hello Robert et al, So under CW in the configuration section, I have 8 choices. The only MicroHam setting is for MKR which is used with SO2R. Im a visually impaired guy so if there is another place o
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00007.html (10,690 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 19:40:49 -0400
As documented in the example configurations for microKEYER, microKEYER II, CW Keyer, and DigiKeyer II, the CW choice is K1EL WinKeyer. The example configurations have been available for more than 10
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00008.html (12,197 bytes)

9. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 01:37:52 +0000
The examples all show screen shots so that is probably not much help for you. Make sure the MicroHam software specifies a port for WinKey. In Writelog, go to ports and set CW keyer type to K1EL Winke
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00009.html (12,333 bytes)

10. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 22:04:06 -0400
On 2020-08-02 9:37 PM, Randy Thompson wrote: The examples all show screen shots so that is probably not much help for you. The examples also include step by step (text) captions. For example (from th
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00010.html (13,638 bytes)

11. Re: [WriteLog] CW Jitters (score: 1)
Author: <rgarrett5@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 23:13:37 -0400
The MicroHam examples are indeed readable. However, Randy, you are correct. Most screen shots are graphical and of no value to us blind guys. I set up everything as directed in the MKII instructions.
/archives//html/WriteLog/2020-08/msg00011.html (15,135 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu