Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Back\-up\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Back\-up\?\?\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:20:19 +0100; Hi all, Hhhmmm. After reading of Mark's (N7MQ) sad loss of data, I began wondering about the back-up facility in WL. I wonder if my assumption is correct: You get reminded very so often (20 Q's in my; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00196.html (8,513 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:52:56 +0000; I haven't read N7MQ's "loss of data" report, but I have had computer crashes of various kinds during contests and have ALWAYS had a successful log recovery following the restart. As it happens, I hav; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00198.html (7,162 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:57:08 +0000; I haven't read N7MQ's "loss of data" report, but I have had computer crashes of various kinds during contests and have ALWAYS had a successful log recovery following the restart. As it happens, I hav; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00199.html (7,456 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "M. Edward Wilborne III" <wilborne@mew3.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:51:22 -0400; This is an interesting topic :) I just do CTRL-S after every QSO... Enter CTRL S for each QSO is my current procedure. Perhaps that "F-Keys" application could be set up to send enter and then ctrl-s?; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00200.html (10,185 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Gordon LaPoint" <gordon@neurophysics.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:59:09 -0400; Hi all, Hhhmmm. After reading of Mark's (N7MQ) sad loss of data, I began wondering about the back-up facility in WL. I wonder if my assumption is correct: You get reminded very so often (20 Q's in my; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00201.html (9,627 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:30:39 -0000; In the WriteLog.ini file (in Windows) under [Configuration] add the line: AutoSaveCount=1 (or another value) Another good tip from the k9jy.com website. 73, Mike K9MI -- Original Message -- From: "M.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00204.html (12,171 bytes)
7. RE: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@w1nr.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:48:39 -0400; The main issue saving every QSO is the lag writing to disk when the log gets big. For casual single ops, the problem is not noticeable. For multi and single op "pros" the time lag is quite noticeable; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00205.html (13,217 bytes)
8. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "A. Sewell" <n5na@att.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:59:42 -0500; Writelog DOES write a journal file. From the Writelog help file: File Backup The entire QSO data base is stored in memory, but is written to disk, or read from disk using the File Save and File Open; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00206.html (9,477 bytes)
9. RE: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@w1nr.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:02:24 -0400; I thought that was the case. Then why was this issue brought up in the first place? Mike, W1NR Writelog DOES write a journal file. From the Writelog help file: File Backup The entire QSO data base is; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00207.html (9,793 bytes)
10. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "M. Edward Wilborne III" <wilborne@mew3.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:17:14 -0400; lol... and it works for me... I've somehow crashed WriteLog a couple of times and was able to recover all my QSOs. _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@conte; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00208.html (11,686 bytes)
11. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:26:24 -0000; When did N7MQ publish his sad tale? Just looked for it and couldn't find it. _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00209.html (15,921 bytes)
12. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:37:19 -0400; "A. Sewell" <n5na@att.net> wrote: "Writelog DOES write a journal file. Another of the many erroneous presumptions that everyone, using WriteLog, not "computer literate"! Reading most of the help file; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00210.html (8,368 bytes)
13. RE: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:13:09 -0000; Trust me, you do not want to back-up after every QSO when you have 2,000+ QSOs in the log, and even little pistols such as me can exceed that number without trying too hard. The delay is a couple of; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00211.html (9,288 bytes)
14. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:19:05 +0000; Well, my system may not be the best in the world, but I have my C drive partitioned into C and D, and a seperate HD serves as E. Although WL has never failed me, even in recovering QSOs when a proble; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00212.html (9,314 bytes)
15. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:19:54 EDT; The best way to handle this is to have a "journal" file which stores all WL does maintain a journal file. If your computer crashes for some reason, WL will ask you if you want to save the journal fil; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00213.html (8,491 bytes)
16. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:55:17 -0400; Floppy disks work quite effectively as costers. 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00214.html (7,687 bytes)
17. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:57:16 -0000; After seeing all the threads about N7MQ's loss of data and not remembering any message by him on the WL reflector I tacked him down and asked where his 'report' was. Turns out on the MMTTY list on Ya; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00219.html (12,564 bytes)
18. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:26:54 -0700; One of the best crash-preventive measures one can take is to upgrade to Windows XP. Anyone still using Win98 or WinME is asking for trouble, IMO. -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00226.html (8,547 bytes)
19. RE: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "ly2ij" <ly2ij@takas.lt>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:29:57 +0300; I had to install Win98 as 2nd operation system to my XP just to have LPT port available. Didn't succeed to make it work from XP using all "userprts" etc. Might be it is just as simple as adding TCP/I; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00230.html (9,047 bytes)
20. Re: [WriteLog] Back-up?? (score: 1): Author: "Donald Eriksen" <don.wsixffh@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:53:42 -0700; I dunno, Bill, after reading some of the latest posts, I'm not sure XP is the best. I know this subject is (was) dead, but after 25 RTTY contests over the last few years without a problem with Writel; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00020.html (8,205 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]