Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+\[microHAM\]\s+WL\s+and\s+winkey\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+\[microHAM\]\s+WL\s+and\s+winkey\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [WriteLog] [microHAM] WL and winkey (score: 1): Author: "Stephen M. Shearer" <wb3lgc@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:25:47 -0500; What does WRITELOG say about the problem? I need a new digital interface for a new radio and I am thinking about adding WinKey as an option. I also need to upgrade Writelog as I am out of date, unles; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00292.html (9,461 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] [microHAM] WL and winkey (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Wright, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:19:43 -0600 (CST); What I have to say about the problem is that: 1. The "solution" promoted by the Winkey support would make it impossible for WL to do auto-CQ, dueling CQ's etc because WL can't tell when the transmis; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00296.html (8,384 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] [microHAM] WL and winkey (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Wright, W5XD" <w5xd@writelog.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:55:22 -0600 (CST); Well, I have to eat some crow here. After typing up the message attached below, I went back and re-read the original K1EL documentation, the complaints from the microHam people, and some individual c; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00297.html (10,887 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] [microHAM] WL and winkey (score: 1): Author: "Jozef Urban, OM7ZZ" <om7zz@stonline.sk>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:23:15 +0100; Wayne, Each programmer can use own approach, our intention was only to point out that the polling is redundant and waste of resorces. When you send message to WinKey, keyer responds at the beginning; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-11/msg00300.html (10,097 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]