Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WL\-USERS\]\s+COM\s+port\s+cards\s+\-\s+ByteRunner\s+and\s+\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WL\-USERS\]\s+COM\s+port\s+cards\s+\-\s+ByteRunner\s+and\s+\?\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WL-USERS] COM port cards - ByteRunner and ??? (score: 1): Author: sporten@ns.net (Steve Porten KN6OX); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:05:57 -0700; Jim I am using a LavaPort650 PCI card with 2 com ports. All I did was plug it in and loaded the drivers. It took no effort on my part to configure it. I run 4 com ports (2 on board and the 2 LavaPort; /archives//html/WriteLog/1999-06/msg00098.html (10,382 bytes)
2. [WL-USERS] COM port cards - ByteRunner and ??? (score: 1): Author: r_auxier@gtmo.net (Rusty and Ann Auxier); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:46:37 -0400; Hello! Here is what I have on that card... I just started subscribing to this reflector, so I don't have that much stuff saved, but I file 'em all away in a seperate folder..... 73 es cul de Rusty KG; /archives//html/WriteLog/1999-06/msg00100.html (9,054 bytes)
3. [WL-USERS] COM port cards - ByteRunner and ??? (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert); Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 13:29:14 -0400; A month or two ago, there was a discussion on this list by someone about having to wait a long time to get a card, finding out it didn't work, then trying another more expensive card that *did* work.; /archives//html/WriteLog/1999-06/msg00102.html (7,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]