Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+FYI\s+\-\s+Multiple\s+MMTTY\s+copies\s+with\s+ONE\s+soundcard\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+FYI\s+\-\s+Multiple\s+MMTTY\s+copies\s+with\s+ONE\s+soundcard\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] FYI - Multiple MMTTY copies with ONE soundcard (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:59:55 -0800; The next question is "How well do those copies of MMTTY demodulate?". Windows is notorious for timing problems when multitasking. I would suggest the multi MMTTY computer be compared side by side wit; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00223.html (8,971 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] FYI - Multiple MMTTY copies with ONE soundcard (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:15:07 +0000; As the processor usage data shows, the computer was not being taxed. I believe each copy would have been given all the processing time it needed up to the point where the processor ran out of cycles.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00224.html (9,600 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]