Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ford@cmgate.com: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1)
Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 22:24:32 -0500
but... Dean: I use an older KAM Plus unit. I find that if the KAM is properly integrated in the software, I get much better results than using a sound card. Why? I can only speculate but here is my o
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00155.html (8,438 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] WL with KAM XL (score: 1)
Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:29:48 -0500
...snip... other Garry, to compare the KAM Plus to a PK232 is like comparing a Lexus to a Hundai. The Kam uses a pair of MF10 filters to process the signals. I can, in software, control the bandwidth
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00161.html (9,713 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] Band map feature (score: 1)
Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:14:28 -0600
I was working 40 M at a M/M this weekend. I had the graveyard shift. 1.5KW into a 4 element full sized 40M yagi at 180' was at my fingertips. It was impressive and depressing to hear all the EU stati
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00486.html (7,961 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] Band map feature (score: 1)
Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:52:31 -0600
Bear with me guys, I'm new to this. Thanks for the info. Ford-N0FP ford@cmgate.com band was calling map. band, organize was not
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-10/msg00489.html (9,706 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] LOTW Question (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:03:00 -0600
I have been using LOTW for some time and have 1400 QSLs sitting there. WL has been working great at getting the info into LOTW. There is a feature at LOTW to download the QSLs received detail in ADIF
/archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00137.html (7,669 bytes)

6. [WriteLog] Loss of focus (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:51:26 -0600
I'm having problems here with my Win98SE sound card. For whatever reason, the MIC control gets turned off every time I move the focus from the mixer controls to any other window in WL. So I have to j
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00496.html (6,742 bytes)

7. [WriteLog] config files (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:26:47 -0500
Running XP Home with TCP/IP network with ALL firewalls disabled. WL10.59D We are doing a M/M for Field Day (<18 hours away) and have managed to lose all my hair. The problem? We have configured WL to
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-06/msg00068.html (7,811 bytes)

8. [WriteLog] Networked Ops (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 12:27:03 -0500
I gotta tell you about my FD weekend. I have never been confronted with such a pig headed piece of software. We've use WL for M/M in the past, but this weekend was hopeless. We installed WL10.59D on
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-06/msg00087.html (10,774 bytes)

9. Re: [WriteLog] Networked Ops (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:24:06 -0500
Thanks for the response John. I believe the real reason for the network on FD is the issue of dupes. Our log has 278 dupes that called us on FD. Obviously, these 278 stations share your opinion on FD
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-06/msg00090.html (10,188 bytes)

10. Re: [WriteLog] Networked Ops (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:02:01 -0500
Each radio can operate any band and mode. Add in a VHF setup and you have a 4 transmitter M/M in operation. That pretty much describes our setup. The Ops drift from band to band to try and get stuff
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-06/msg00092.html (10,456 bytes)

11. Re: [WriteLog] Field Day (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:29:05 -0500
"Cut throat?" Well, I have never met a contester that would cut anybody's throat. But I have met quite a few that want to fine tune their operations to squeeze the most performance out of the station
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-06/msg00104.html (10,448 bytes)

12. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Port Choppy CW (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:35:18 -0500
...snip... I have been using LPT1 keying on WL for years. I never get choppy CW. The secret? Turn off your screen savers, leave windows with the default (plain jane) desktop format. Turn off all batt
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-06/msg00132.html (9,558 bytes)

13. [WriteLog] V10.59D networking is busted (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 22:16:51 -0500
I just got a confirming email tonight that one of the folks that was here on FD, pulling their hair out related to WL networking, went home and tried to run the RAC contest using two computers. Using
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00009.html (6,930 bytes)

14. Re: [WriteLog] V10.59D networking is busted (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 22:13:40 -0500
I got another email from Hal-N4GG with similar comments. Scott and Hal's responses to me make me think the WL world views this as "Chicken Little saying the sky is falling." My ponderings since then
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00012.html (9,603 bytes)

15. Re: [WriteLog] "its broken" (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 21:57:53 -0500
Fair enough. How's this... All of these relate to a clean boot of XP-Home with all updates available current and loaded. The ONLY software running was WL 10.59DFULL downloaded the week before Field
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00020.html (12,835 bytes)

16. Re: [WriteLog] "its broken" (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:53:23 -0500
When Wayne posted this... I responded direct and through the reflector. A long list of issues followed. However, what I immediately got back was this... Your message has encountered delivery problems
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00024.html (8,232 bytes)

17. Re: [WriteLog] "its broken" (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 20:28:54 -0500
I'm not so sure it is the network aspect. I am coming to believe that there are hooks that can be placed into the INI file that make things sing. Unfortunately, nobody has bothered to explain the INI
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00027.html (10,973 bytes)

18. [WriteLog] "Broken" INI issues (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:29:42 -0500
I think we are making progress. I particularly appreciated Dean Wood's posting that verifies that I've not been on dope regarding the "Save configuration" issues. It's busted and needs fixing. What h
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00043.html (8,887 bytes)

19. Re: [WriteLog] "It's broken" (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:40:45 -0500
Folks, I can most assuredly attest to the fact that the WL manual is incomplete, and in places inaccurate. I have attempted to follow the instructions to a "T" and that they simply are incomplete. I
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00044.html (10,262 bytes)

20. Re: [WriteLog] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 18:41:35 -0500
Wayne, I'd be happy to complain elsewhere. I didn't view my comments as complaints as much as simple observations of fact. Nobody suggested you get rid of the INI files. Heck, that's how things run n
/archives//html/WriteLog/2006-07/msg00055.html (8,398 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu